Search This Blog

Saturday, February 21, 2026

Russell's Theology

 The following is found in the October 15, 1908, Watch Tower. Conflicting interpretations are found in 'the literature.' Please read it carefully. How do you understand this?

The divine purpose in the redemption provided was to bring a blessing to all the families of the earth-a release from sin and death conditions and a return to divine favor to all who would be obedient; hence our Lord's work did not end with the application of his merit to those who were accepted of the Father as members of his Body. Rather the sacrifice was allowed to continue on a larger scale-a sacrificing of the Church, the members of his Body being counted as a continuation and a completion of our Lord's own personal sacrifice. When all the members of this great mystical Body shall have suffered with him”-when he as the great antitypical High Priest shall have offered up not only himself but us, his adopted members, then justice will have all that it ever demanded and much more. It will have the one great valuable sacrifice of Jesus and additionally the sacrifice of his members-144,000 justified through faith in his blood, whose sacrifice the Apostle declares to be in God's sight holy and acceptable.”-Rom. 12:1.

Would it be right for justice to accept 144,001 sacrifices when only the one was really demanded? We answer, Yes. Justice is not hindered-divine justice would not be stopped from receiving all of those sacrifices in the manner arranged. Justice could not have demanded more, however, nor accepted less, than the one perfect life. We are to remember that none of these sacrifices was demanded nor compelled by justice merely a high reward for faithfulness was held out for the time. Our Lord was attracted thereby and For the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame.” 

As a matter of fact the divine plan through him opened the door of opportunity to others who have His spirit (disposition) during this Age, to a limited fore-ordained number, which we believe to be 144,000. Their sacrifice was not demanded. It was voluntary and because they saw riches of grace and .divine rewards which they esteemed to be their privilege to attain. Thus in the divine plan the world has been redeemed much less directly than we may have imagined, but much to our advantage, in that it has permitted us to become members of the Bride Class, members of the Body of the Great Mediator, whose work throughout the Millennial Age will be that of Intercessor and· Go-between and Mediator between God and men-the world in general. We, who now come in under this arrangement as members of the Body, members of the Seed of Abraham,” members of the Great Antitypical Mediator, Prophet, Priest, King, Judge, are as his members under his supervision yielding up our lives in sacrifice during this Age, and these sacrificed lives counted in with his constitute the blood of The Christ, which seals the New Covenant between God and the world. That New Covenant will not be sealed until all the blood of the Great Mediator has been shed. Then Head and Body, Bridegroom and Bride, we shall be presented before the Father and the blood of the Great Christ, as shown in the types of Leviticus, will then avail for the cancellation of the world's sin, even as the blood of Jesus now avails for our sins.


Friday, February 20, 2026

Various

 

Some of you know that I took a bad fall. I’m still suffering the effects, sleeping more than usual and not up to working much. So, if you have a blog post you want me to consider, please send it on. Also, you may want to further Jerome’s research. It’s excellent, and adds important detail that doesn’t fit in the Separate Identity narrative.

I would appreciate your comments on this: I have many vintage anti-Watchtower booklets. Among these are many from the 1940s. As is true of most anti-Witness controversialist material they are full of poor reasoning, lies, ad hominem, and stupidity. But they are historical documents, and some add detail to the narrative. I’m considering republishing them in an annotated edition.

I hesitate to do this given their offensive nature. But they ARE part of our history. What do you think?

Now on to other things. A recent email said: “WTS has been trying to remove and cleanse their history, and it's becoming harder to find old documents.” I want to state here that this is total nonsense. One cannot expect them to oppose their own theology. But they do not buy up, erase, or otherwise hide documents. One can find every Watchtower, Awake, Consolation, Golden Age, booklet and book they ever published. Most are online; the rest are available through interlibrary loan or direct request to the institution owning the material.

No ethical academic would call Jehovah’s Witnesses a cult. Those who fear them, who cannot refute their doctrine except by repeating that they do not agree use the term to color the Witnesses in shades of black. That is the same thinking behind the Catholic Inquisition. And there ARE clergy and anti-cult writers who would gladly burn Witnesses at the stake if the law did not prevent them.

Assume personal responsibility. The person who wrote the email I’ve mentioned did not like the restrictions Witness theology places on its adherents. You cannot fornicate, steal, use illegal drugs, or misbehave in other ways. Fine. You don’t want to live under those restrictions, just don’t. No-one is forcing you to do that. 

Sunday, February 15, 2026

Alexander Turney Stewart


Alexander Turney Stewart was the founder of the department store as we today know it. Born in 1803 he used a legacy to invest in Irish linens and opened a store in New York in the early 1920s. He grew to be a multi-millionaire. His story is told in Wikipedia.

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Turney_Stewart

The reason he appears here on this blog is because there are connections with CTR’s family. They may go back to the old country, Ireland, or if not, to the Russell family’s early days in America.

Among CTR’s family were three Uncles who all went to America, and they all had connections with Turney Stewart.

Uncle Charles TAYS Russell’s obituary mentions Stewart.



The obituary states he received his early lessons in active business from A T Stewart. That could be anything from a tutelage to working in Stewart’s New York store.

Uncle James Russell (who bought the grave plot for the family in the Allegheny cemetery) ran a boarding school and academy in Elmwood Hill, Bloomingdale, New York for around 20 years. For most of those years his newspaper advertisements said a prospectus could be obtained from A T Stewart’s Broadway Store. (Did Stewart help with finance?)



And third – Uncle Alexander who spent most of his American life in New York and New Jersey had a daughter named Cornelia born in 1840. A family history document says she was “named for Mrs A T Stewart” – who was indeed a Cornelia



So there are at least three connections between CTR’s Uncles and the multi-millionaire Stewart. The last one about the name Cornelia suggests the link were not just business, but personal.

There is a chain from Stewart’s Irish linen store and dry goods in New York, to Charles Tays’ Russell opening something similar in Pittsburgh, to his brother Joseph Lytle joining him, to CTR taking over that type of business and selling shirts.

Unfortunately few documents from Stewart’s business empire have survived today, so it may never be possible to join all the dots.

Unless anyone out there has more information? 


Friday, February 6, 2026

James


This material is a proposed chapter for a future book on the History of the Russell family.

As with the previous extract (see post from January 28) comments are welcome, either here or send back-channel to Jerome.

The Aunt Sarah document that is the starting point for this article can be examined here in an earlier draft of this material:

https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/2021/01/the-russell-family-tree.html

    

     James was the oldest of the ten children of James Russell and Fannie Grier who survived to adulthood, and was born c.1796. His register of death from 1847 simply states that he came from Ireland. He will have been one of the first to go to America if not THE first, paving the way for others. His history, as given by Aunt Sarah, suggests a possible trail-blazer, a patriarch of the family, but he ended up in Pittsburgh and died comparatively young, five years before CTR was born. Aunt Sarah tells us that James married Sarah Ann Risk. We learn elsewhere in the document that the Risk family were Episcopalians in Faun, Ireland (which is most likely Fahan in County Donegal), and father George Risk (married to a Sarah) was an excise officer. We also note from the history of Alexander Russell, who we will come to later, but who married Sarah Ann’s sister, Margaret, that James and Sarah were already a married couple in America in Elmwood Hill, New York, by 1832.

     James’ history gives a field for more research. Quoting directly from Aunt Sarah:

“James was educated at Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, conducted his Collegiate and Commercial Institute at Elmwood Hill, Bloomingdale, N.Y. now included in Central Park near West 103rd Street.”

     So he started his education in Dublin but then “conducted” an institute in New York.

     Trinity College, Dublin, was founded in 1592. Famous alumni include James Ussher (he of Bible chronology), literary figures like Jonathan Swift, Oliver Goldsmith and later Oscar Wilde, philosophers like Edmund Burke, and statesmen like Eamon de Valera. it was specifically founded as an educational institution for Protestants who supported the established church. That meant Anglicans; non-conformists like Presbyterians would have issues.  However, James was to take the faith of his wife and her family and become Episcopalian. As for Roman Catholics, they were basically barred by a required oath until 1793. Matters were then relaxed somewhat and religious tests were abolished by Act of Parliament in 1873, at which point the Irish Catholic Bishops banned their flock from enrolling. The matter was not finally resolved until 1970.

     By the time James enrolled Protestants of all shapes and sizes could attend. The original emphasis on theology gradually broadened to include a whole range of subjects, including mathematics, medicine, law, science and engineering.

     The enrolment records for Trinity have survived. Examining lists of those who enrolled between 1803 and 1829 (which are in two volumes covering 1803-1814, 1815-1829) there are twenty Russells in total on the books – but only one James.

     This solitary James was entered for enrolment on 3 November 1823 and “put on the books” as the register puts it, on 22 November 1823. His tutor is listed as W. Harte.


     At this time, if this was OUR James he would have been in his late twenties. One might expect the James Russell in Aunt Sarah’s account to have attended college a little earlier in life. However, this is the only James found in extant enrolment records for Trinity College, and they do appear to be very comprehensive. It seems likely that James returned to Ireland from America for a short while for some of his education. As we will see when discussing Alexander Turney Stewart in the chapter on Charles Tays Russell, some people did travel back and forth across the Atlantic at this time if they had good enough reason to do so.

     According to Aunt Sarah the institute that James was involved with was called the Collegiate and Commercial Institute at Elmwood Hill, Bloomingdale, New York. There were some name changes over two decades but always with James G Russell at the helm.

     The New York papers, particularly The Evening Post ran a prospectus and advertisement for this for a good number of years. On the next page is one example, taken from the paper for 10 September 1835. As the reproduction is quite small, the details will be reviewed on following pages.


     The school had been established at its present location for the past eight years. That would take us back to around 1827.

     It was a boarding school for young boys. There were four classes covering four years, and the wide range of subjects included: Spelling, Reading, Writing, Mathematics (including book-keeping), Geography, Elocution, Mythology, Astronomy, and History (particularly of the United States). If a young person stayed to the final year they could enjoy:

 “Logic, Belle Lettres, Natural and Moral Philosophy, Chymistry (sic), Political Economy, with an explanation of the Constitution of the United States, and of the State of New York.”

     There were extra charges for those who needed Greek, Latin, French, Spanish and Drawing. The terms per annum were not cheap but did include “Board, Tuition, Washing and Mending.”

     To offer these services for four classes, which one assumes ran concurrently, would require the hiring of staff.

     The principal (James G Russell of Elmwood Hill) explained the regime:

“It is exclusively a Boarding School; and no pupils are admitted but such as will board and reside in the family, and under the constant supervision of the principal, and pursue the prescribed course under his immediate direction. The discipline of the school is mild and parental, but sufficiently energetick (sic) to secure the performance of the prescribed duties; but it has been a favourite object to dispense with corporeal punishment, and substitute the incentive of emulation, a sense of honour, duty and propriety. Principles of piety and morality are constantly inculcated without interfering with the tenets of any particular sect. The family of the principal, and the pupils, attend the Episcopal Church.”

     It noted in passing that “a small item is charged for pew rent.”

     One trusts that this was a step-up from Dotheboys Hall in Charles Dickens’ Nicholas Nickleby.

     Of particular interest is the announcement that ran at the end of the advertisement for many years that those who wanted a prospectus or more information could obtain such from Messrs. A.T. Stewart and Co., 257 Broadway. We will see when discussing Charles Tays Russell that his obituary has him working either with or for Stewart when he came to America. There was obviously a long connection between Alexander Turney Stewart and some of the Russell family, even if we can’t join all the dots today.

     The advertisements for a New York boarding school featuring James G Russell go right back to 1820. James would have been about 25 years old at the time.

     The first known appearance of James was in The Evening Post for 9 June 1820.


     The heading was ACADEMY AT STATEN ISLAND and it announced its opening. It offered the usual subjects and noted that:

“A limited number of young gentlemen, not exceeding 12 years of age, can be accommodated with boarding, washing and mending in the family of the teacher.”

     The location was on the northeast side of Staten Island. James’ hype concluded:

The local situation of the academy, in point of beauty, convenience, and salubrity of air, is surpassed by none. The subscriber flatters himself that the above advantages, joined to his own exertions, to promote the improvement and regulate the morals of those committed to his care, shall entitle him to a share of the public patronage.”

     It was signed JAMES G. RUSSELL and had references from a Naval Officer and two Health Officers.

     It looked very much like a start-up operation. However, the date does suggest that James was the first of his generation to travel to America, therefore able to help younger family members when they arrived. Charles Tays Russell, for example, was only about 16 years old when he made the trip in 1822.

     By 1824 James’s Academy had moved to the “rear of the Dutch Church” and was advertised as a “Boarding School at Bloomingdale.” (The Evening Post for 7 May 1924; unless otherwise indicated, all further references to James’ school will be from this paper).

     In 1825 (9 May 1825) it was “J. G. Russell’s Boarding School” which was “now open for the accommodation of six or eight young Gentlemen.”

     The advertisements then disappeared for nearly two years, which may supports the assumption that James went back to the old country to do courses at Trinity College, Dublin.

    When James reappeared in 1827 (3 April 1827) he announced a relocation of his Boarding school, and revealed his “object is to establish a s  elect school, exclusively for boarders, the number of whom is limited to 20.”

     The idea of the school being “select” – with a specific class of clientele as a target – comes over in the promise:

“French and Spanish are taught by a highly approved teacher, who is detained as a permanent resident in the family, with a view to render the French, as much as practicable, the language of the family.”

     Again, it sounds very much like a start-up venture, or a re-start-up. It ties in with his 1935 announcement (already reviewed) that the school had operated in its present form for the past eight years.

     By 1930 (27 November 1830) it had become ELMWOOD HILL JUVENILE INSTITUTE  with James G, Russell as principal, and was now linked to Mr A T Stewart’s premises at 257 Broadway.


   The 1931 advertisement (28 May 1831) show the number accommodated to have risen to about 40, with extensive enlargements underway to expand further. By now it sounds like a success story.

    In 1932 (21 September 1832) the name changed again Now it was ELMWOOD HILL BOARDING SCHOOL (Six miles from City Hall, New York). James noted for prospective new clients:

“The number of pupils and limited and select, and none are admitted but such as reside with the family of the principal, with whom they fare at a common board, and by whom they are treated in all respects as children in a well regulated and Christian family.”

     By 1834 (6 August 1834), yet more improvements to the buildings made it possible to expand the business and accommodate additional pupils. Circulars with more information were still available from A T Stewart’s emporium.

     The 1835 advertisement has already been reproduced in full and discussed above. By now the name Aunt Sarah remembered, ELMWOOD HILL COLLEGIATE AND COMMERCIAL INSTITUTE was featured and remained in place (with just one slight tweak) for the rest of its history.

     So James G  Russell’s Collegiate and Commerical Institute was a success story, pitching its services to the wealthier classes who could afford the ever increasing fees.

     As noted earlier, Aunt Sarah’s source document gave a brief snapshot for James in 1832. He is well established in America, married to his own Sarah and living in Elmwood Hill, New York. Aunt Sarah records that:

“James and Sarah having no children ‘adopted’ Thomas Russell, son of (his brother) Alexander.”

     This Thomas Russell was born in 1833.

     It would appear that young Thomas joined the family of boarders at the Elmwood Hill School.

     James’ history leaves a number of questions for which we may never have the answers. Why did he start a Boarding school in 1920? Why was it in New York? Once the school was up and running it should have been quite profitable, but how was he able to fund such a venture initially?

     It all seems to have come to an abrupt end in 1840. The advertisements for the Elmwood establishment suddenly disappeared in May 1840, never to return.

     The final advertisement had a slight change of title:


     The reference to “the last ten years” suggests yet another change of venue from back in 1830. As always, more information was available from A T Stewart’s.

     But for all its appearance of a flourishing going concern, that was it.

     What happened next we do not know. We assume this might be when James and Sarah moved from New York to Pittsburgh, to join his younger brother, Charles Tays. We don’t know why they moved and we don’t know what they did when they got there. Was the master plan to start another school, or did James just work for his brother? We do know that he and Sarah returned to New York at one point but both were to die in the Pittsburgh area.

     As far as Pittsburgh was concerned, the first fairly positive sighting of James was in 1843.

     On Monday, 16 October 1843 The Pittsburgh Daily Post newspaper published a list of letters waiting at the Post Office for collection. It was a new feature of the newspaper that, regrettably for researchers, had only started that year.

     In the paper for 16 October, and repeated over the next two days, there was a letter waiting for James.


     We can reasonably assume this is the James who is married to Sarah. Next to him in the list, also with a letter to collect, is his brother, Joceph (sic) L(ytle) Russell. A few weeks later in the issue for 18 November 1843 the list included Charles T(ays) Russell, so it appears that all three brothers were in Pittsburgh together by 1843. We will return to Joseph and Charles later.

     James evidently intended Pittsburgh to be became a permanent home because in 1846 he bought one of the first grave plots to go on the market in the new Allegheny Cemetery. He obviously had sufficient funds to do this. He and his extended family were going to stay there. Forever. Literally.

     However, before this happened, there was one final try back in New York. From The Evening Post for 2 October 1845.


     James called himself “a graduate of a distinguished University” and offered accommodation for six boys in his own home at 227 Fulton Street, Brooklyn. It was almost a repeat of his first advertisement back in 1820. And the contact for more information was still A T Stewart and Co., Broadway, NY.

     It may be that declining health for both James and Sarah was why this last try was short lived. Within a little over a year Sarah would be dead, and in a little over two years, so would James. They would die in the Pittsburgh area and be buried in the plot James had bought in 1846 at the Allegheny Cemetery.

Insert material on the Allegheny cemetery and the Russell family plot. Adapted from:

https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-russells-and-allegheny-cemetery.html

     The Allegheny Cemetery charter laid down strict legal provisions for inheritance of family plots. They would first go to children (James and Sarah did not have any) then to parents (who are assumed to be long dead in the old country), and then to brothers and sisters. Over the years ownership of the plot would pass first to James’ brother Charles, and then to his brother Joseph and finally to his son, CTR.

     In summary: of Thomas and Fanny Russell’s ten children who lived to adulthood, James appears as the oldest, the firstborn. He may have been a pioneer, perhaps the first of the family to travel to America, specifically to New York. By Aunt Sarah’s account he was well educated. By his own testimony he was “a graduate of a distinguished University.” What might he have accomplished had he lived? But sadly, he was to die comparatively young, several years before CTR was born. Hence, he was to be forgotten by history.


IMPORTANT ADDENDA TO POST ON JAMES RUSSELL

Since posting the above a significant alteration needs to be made. When and if this is incorporated into a book on the Russell Family History, the chapter will be rewritten to reflect the latest information.

I asked Trinity College if they had more information on James Russell who studied there. They have come back to me with full information on the James Russell who was admitted as a student in 1823. The problem is that this James is 15 years old and checking his history has no connection to our story.

This is the only James in the register for the relevant period. So although Aunt Sarah said “James was educated at Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland,” there is no primary documentation to support that. Trinity College (Dublin) records are quite comprehensive, and it would seem that James Grier Russell is not there. In the New York Evening Post for 2 October 1845 James described himself as “graduate of a distinguished University, and long known in New York as an efficient teacher.”

The type of education offered by his boarding school suggests he would need that level of education unless he just employed qualified teachers of the day. He doesn’t say which university he graduated from and, on reflection, I suspect that if it had been as prestigious as Trinity College, Dublin, he might have said so.

So what happened? Did someone exaggerate along the way? Or did Aunt Sarah, writing over half a century after the events, just assume something from second and third-hand comments and get it wrong?

There is a lesson to never take anything for granted. And my thanks to Trinity College for eventually looking up the fuller picture and taking the time to get back to me.

It is a disappointment, but as far as is humanly possible, what we write has to be accurate.

 


Monday, February 2, 2026

Can we identify date and place

 This is an undated convention photo. It appears to be a UK convention, late 1930s or early 1940s. Can you identify it further?