Are any of our readers members/fellows of the Royal Historical Society?
THE STORY IS IN THE DETAILS - Notice: I've withdrawn my books from Amazon. They are now only available at Lulu.com
I need basic biography for G. H. Lancaster, vicar of St. Stephen's, Bow, London. I especially need birth and death dates, where he was educated, any printed sermons. I have his book on the war and prophecy. I do not need that.
Anyone?
Guest post by Gary.
A
remarkable piece of Bible Student history, much forgotten about in later times,
involved the visit of three members to the White House on late Friday
afternoon, 11th January 1918, to receive audience with no lesser person than
the 28th President of the United States himself, Woodrow Wilson.
The
decision to visit followed multiple attempts made over many months by Joseph
Rutherford to bend the ear of various authorities so as to gain leniency for a
number of Bible Students who had claimed exemption when they registered for the
draft, but had then been treated harshly by both their draft boards and the
various army war camps they had been sent to throughout the United States. Up
until this time the Bible Students were just one of several religious groups
who had been viewed with suspicion due to their unwillingness to fight. But
though some religious opponents had already attempted to muddy the waters, The
Finished Mystery had not become the focus of criticism by the authorities
as would shortly be the case.
Having
tried every other reasonable attempt at diplomacy, and in the hope that this
impasse could yet be broken, at the annual meeting of the IBSA held in
Pittsburgh on 5 January 1918, a resolution was adopted defining the position of
the Bible Students concerning combatant service in the war, asking that its
members be given the privileges of Section 4 of the Selective Services Act.
Perhaps in this we can see the start of the resolutions that were sent to
various world leaders and became a feature of later conventions.
The
resolution started with a conciliatory tone stating early that “we believe our
position as a religious organization ... is not fully understood by various
officers and representatives of the United States Government” and explained
that it was the hope that it this might change. The first point of the
resolution even called President Wilson “a great man who is using his power and
influence conscientiously and according to his best judgement in the interests
of the peoples of the world and particularly of the United States.”
Had the
resolution simply pleaded for those Bible Students incarcerated in army camps
throughout the United States to have been shown reasonable consideration, as
had largely been the case with the traditional peace churches, such as the
Mennonites, Brethren and Quakers, the resolution might have been favourably
received or, alternatively, easily dismissed. But in keeping with the tradition
of the Old Testament prophets, opportunity was also taken to pass comment on
the questionable alliance between the governments and prominent religious
authorities of the day. Notably the fifth point stated:
With charity to all and malice
toward none, we feel it our duty humbly to call attention to the fact that the
nations are now passing through the great crisis foretold by the prophets of
the Lord, and that God is now expressing his displeasure toward the
relationship existing between ecclesiastical and civil kingdoms of the earth,
particularly as set forth in the following cited Scriptures, to wit:
Revelation, chapters 17 and 18; Ezekiel, chapter 34.
Rutherford delegated the responsibility to share the resolution to three capable and adept Bible Students: Dr Atwood Smith of Louisville, Kentucky, who acted as Chairman, Ernest Sexton, of Los Angeles, California, and Edward Brenneisen, of New York City. The resolution was to be taken in person to President Wilson, and then to Secretary of War, Newton Baker, with access gained by appointment made via Joseph P. Tumulty, the President’s Secretary
President
Wilson’s religious background and his diplomatic posture
Woodrow
Wilson was a highly educated man and by religion a Presbyterian with a strong
sense of purpose and vision. He knew his Bible inside out, being one
of only a few men who could have held his own in a discussion on scripture with
the three Bible Students, had the conversation gone that way. But in
interpretation he was poles apart from his earnest but persistent audience.
Wilson had studied Social Gospel under Richard T. Ely at Johns Hopkins in the
1880s, and he represented the sensibility of the mainstream Protestant churches
in his approach to reform. Having a powerful sense of right and
wrong, like so many Americans of the time, Wilson considered the development
and survival of his country as little less than miraculous. If America did
have a manifest destiny to follow, who better to chart its course and lead the
world than the President himself? Post millennial thought was
central to Wilson’s crusade to make the world "safe for democracy"
through the entry of the United States into the Great War. As
premillennialists, Bible Students would not share Wilson’s vision of the Social
Gospel, American nationalism and superiority, and, as Zoe Knox has noted,
“appeared as opponents not only of the conflict but, ... of the optimism and
belief that characterized America in times of both war and peace.” Yet even
they recognised its rise in status as Biblically predicted and rejoiced since, as
Pastor Russell had stated, they considered that “quite the majority of the New
Creation live under the highest forms of civil government to be found in the
world to-day, and appreciate this as a divine favor and blessing.”
Before we
understand what took place that day we should first be aware of an event that
had occurred some years earlier involving President Wilson, a large petition
rather than a resolution, and a visit of a different minority group who sought
Wilson’s assistance.
Though
seen as an enlightening place to welcome immigrants with the offer of liberty
at the time, America was, of course, still very much a racially divided
society. During his earlier years Wilson had seemingly offered to bridge
differences between white and black Americans to gain popularity. But, in fact,
like many Presidents before and after, his preferences remained strongly white.
In one November afternoon during 1914 Wilson was visited by William Monroe
Trotter, a black civil rights leader and Boston newspaper editor, who had
previously received and been satisfied by vague assurances from Wilson of his
wishes to help, but by now Trotter was no longer impressed by words
only. To force a showdown, Trotter defiantly pushed his cause to the
point of no return by publicly challenging the President’s policy of
segregation. A heated exchange ensued when, shocked by Trotter’s
persistent manner, the President reacted angrily by ordering him and his
supporters out of the Oval Office. The resultant bad press earned Wilson
no favours.
Afterwards,
in defending his actions Wilson acknowledged his error was, unfortunately,
not that of racism, but that of public relations:
What I ought to have done
would have been to (have) listened, restrained my resentment, and, when they
had finished, to have said to them that, of course, their petition (would)
receive consideration. They would then have withdrawn quietly and no more would
have been heard about the matter.
Cynical
though it may seem, this diplomatic posture appears to have largely adopted by
President Wilson when he received the IBSA delegation in early 1918.
A
positive encounter?
An upbeat
letter sent to Sister Abbott, hopeful of a positive outcome, appeared in the St.
Paul Enterprize, an unofficial Bible Student newspaper, and also The
Farmington Times, Missouri, explaining in some detail the nature of the
conversation and written by Sexton, one of the three Bible Students delegates
to visit.
According
to Sexton the three men were welcomed into the White House and cordially
treated. The President listened attentively and expressed comments of concern
regarding the conscientious objectors involved, implying that it hadn’t been
the intention of the Selective Service Act to persecute genuine men holding
religious scruples. The President implied his intention to deal with
the matter to alleviate their suffering. Encouraged by the time allowed and the
President’s apparent concern the men did more than simply leave the long
petition for him to read thereafter, they read it to him word by word.
Sexton
waxed lyrical in his description of the President:
My personal impression of Mr.
Wilson is, first of all, that he is a perfect gentleman and receives one with
true courtesy. His manner is quiet - in no way flurried or excited,
and he would hardly impress one as having practically the weight of the world
on his shoulders; in fact, he would rather give the impression that he had
nothing else to do but receive us and thus kill a little time. Another thing
very noticeable about this man of prominence is that he is far better looking
than any picture would indicate. He has a very pleasant personality, and
he is by no means the cold-blooded machine that many believe him to be.
The
letter recorded that Wilson listened patiently while the resolution was read to
him, seemingly noted every point made and, at the conclusion, asked if the IBSA
conscientious objectors involved would be prepared to engage in work if a
reconstructive nature, such as Red Cross work, or anything that was not
decidedly of a war or war preparatory nature. In reply the committee explained
that in every case this was an individual matter for each man to decide. Also,
that though some might be prepared to do such they feared that in order to do
so they would be expected to don the army uniform and take the oath of a
soldier, which they would not do. The committee explained that these
young men were not cowards, but were prepared to suffer any indignity, even
death itself, rather than to discard their religious scruples. At this point
the President seemed too show much feeling, responding quickly that “we have no
desire to heap indignities upon these men.”
Sexton
commented that the President “intimated that the courts which had passed
sentences upon the brethren had exceeded their authority, rather through
ignorance than malice. He promised to give the matter his personal attention,
taking a copy of the resolution and putting it with some other papers that were
evidently marked due quick action.”
Gratified
by the response the committee went over to the War Department since the
President had arranged an interview with Secretary of War, Newton Baker. Baker
also listened to the reading of the resolution and asked pertinent questions
while reassuring the men that he and the President were of one mind concerning
genuine conscientious objectors, but had difficulty in showing too much
leniency in case many others might seek to evade military service who were not.
The
report from Sexton concluded positively:
We have every reason to
believe our visit is bearing fruit, and later developments will doubtless
demonstrate this to be true.
A more cautious approach, reading Revelation
chapters 17 and 18 to the Secretary of War, a casual jest by President Wilson
and the point of the chapters tragically missed
A more
cautious approach was adopted by The Watch Tower of the time which
reflected that “what effect this resolution may have we cannot of course know.”
Rutherford had perhaps read a little too much into a previous casual
governmental response which had seemed to imply recognition of the IBSA, and so
no longer wanted to raise undue hopes based on vague governmental inferences.
A side
light to the meeting has been provided in recent times by Mennonite historian
Duane Stoltzfus. In considering the Wilson papers, he records that
Baker heard representations from a variety of religious objectors including
“Mennonites, Brethren, Amish, and Hutterites, he heard from Seventh Day
Adventists; Russellites, later known as Jehovah’s Witnesses; Molokans, members
of a small Russian Christian pacifist sect living in the Southwest; and others.
At one point Baker joked with the President, the son of a Presbyterian
minister, about a religious group that felt compelled to read to him the
seventeenth and eighteenth chapters of Revelation while making its case.
Wilson, a Bible reader with his own sense of humor, replied that when he met with
the group, there was no reading from Revelation - they figured that the
president knew the passage by heart, he intimated, unlike his wayward secretary
of war.”
Stoltzfus
did not locate which religious group was the one in question. But we may hazard
a reasonable guess by noting that point 5 of the IBSA resolution included
reference to precisely the two chapters of Revelation that Baker
mentioned. Ironically, the amusing jest made by President Wilson may
have caused the two men in authority to take too lightly the seriousness of the
chapters concerned.
In
fairness to President Wilson, to a limited degree it may be said he did respond
favourably to the visit of the three IBSA men, and indeed to other religious
groups who attempted to bend his ear at this time. In March the President
belatedly gave a much-needed definition explaining what the term ‘non-combatant’
involved. Since the Selective Service Act had been enacted some 10 months
earlier this had remained undefined and caused considerable and unnecessary
confusion amongst conscientious objectors and the military authorities alike.
It was to the President’s credit that this was now resolved, yet to his debit
that he had dallied so long and, in so doing, caused untold suffering to so
many. It was not just the COs rotting in army camps who had unnecessarily
suffered. Army officers throughout the US attempting to train men
for their military offensive found the existence of COs at best an unneeded
inconvenience, and at worst a dissenting and disquieting influence in Camp that
they would have preferred to be without. It strapped their resources and pushed
their patience to an extreme.
In the
cold light of day
At the
time, the visit of the IBSA committee appeared to be well received and offered
hope for a positive outcome. In the cold light of day, however, the attempt
achieved little success and was later seen as an abject failure. Indeed, The
Golden Age later commented:
A committee bearing this
resolution called upon President Wilson and personally read and presented it to
him. Our troubles began shortly thereafter.
Sexton
also likely viewed his earlier upbeat letter with embarrassment. By early
July 1918 he was arrested in Portland, Oregon, as just one of twenty-six Bible
Students charged with circulating copies of The Kingdom News as a
protest against the Government’s suppression of The Finished Mystery.
Consequently, he was alleged to be in violation of the Espionage Act by
authorities who now took exception to the Bible Student message.
Sources:
The
New Creation,Studies in the Scriptures,
volume 6, 1904, 594
The
Watch Tower, 1 July 1917, [Reprints 6110]
The
Watch Tower, 15 January 1918, [Reprints
6203]
The
St. Paul Enterprize, 12 February 1918, 4
The
Farmington Times, Missouri, 22 February
1918, 3
The
Los Angeles Herald, 3 July 1918, 8
The
Oregon Daily Journal, 3 July 1918, 3
The
Express Tribune, Los Angeles,
6 October 1918
The
Golden Age, 9 June 1920, 590
Secondary
Sources:
Pacifists
in Chains - the Persecution of Hutterites during the Great War, Duane Stoltzfus, John Hopkins University Press,
Baltimore, 2013, 69-70
Black
Radical: The Life and Times of William Monroe Trotter, Kerri Greenidge, Liveright 2019
“A Greater Danger than a
Division of the German Army”, Zoe Knox, Peace & Change, vol. 44, No.2,
April 2019, 234
Postscript
from Jerome:
For those who like to know these things, Edward
Brenneisen stayed with the Watchtower Society and died as a Jehovah’s Witness
in 1956.
Ernest Sexton left fellowship with the IBSA and died in
1932.
Dr Samuel Atwood Smith died in 1930. His religious
history after the death of CTR is not known.
If you have not already seen it, please look at the post "50th Wedding Anniversary" just below this one.
In the 1870s there were numerous small
Bible classes loosely affiliated with various papers, some Age to Come, some
different strands of Adventism. People obtained papers from all manner of
sources, and when ZWT started publication it was initially just one more to add
to the list. Eventually, people started to choose which direction they viewed
as “the truth,” and the Bible Student movement, with its separate identity,
came into being.
However, many attending gatherings that
became “Bible Student” meetings continued to still read widely, even if, as
time went by, it may have been politic to keep quiet about it.
In the first few decades of ZWT’s publication, alternative magazines were still being read by various Bible Students as well. This might help us understand certain subject matter in early ZWTs. On occasion CTR would be responding to the work of others which he knew his readers were receiving. The Tabernacle and its Teachings (later rewritten into Tabernacle Shadows) was originally written, at least in part, to combat the writings of Nelson Barbour.
The Herald of the Morning
In the 1890s Nelson Barbour’s paper The Herald of the Morning was obviously
still seen by a few. In the follow up to 1894’s Harvest Siftings (special issue
of ZWT for April 25, 1894) defector S D Rogers was accused of visiting ZWT
congregations with
First, Rogers knew who Barbour was and where
Barbour was, to go to him for support against CTR. Second, it was reported back
to CTR that this had actually happened. Third, Barbour was still sufficently
well-known to ZWT readers for CTR to mention the event as a warning. CTR’s
comment would only have real meaning if Barbour was still on selected Bible
Students’ radar.
This is supported by what happened when a
few Bible Students, including a Watch Tower Society director, Augustus Weimar, left
fellowship and joined the Koreshan Unity in 1895. This was a strange group that
among other things believed the earth was hollow and mankind lived inside it.
In the September 1895 issue of the Koreshan
magazine, The Flaming Sword, they
used one of Barbour’s articles from November 1891 to attack CTR’s theology. It
seems likely that the Koreshans got this from their new intake of ex-ZWT supporters.
However, this means that at least one of those supporters was still reading
Barbour’s Herald into the 1890s.
https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/2021/03/the-watch-tower-and-koreshan-unity.html
The
World’s Hope
John Paton left fellowship with CTR around 1882 and started his own paper The World’s Hope, promoting Universalist views. Looking an extant copies of this paper, a number of well-known ZWT names were also readers. It was Paton who reported on the death of the first ZWT president, W H Conley, and obviously knew and was in contact with him. The account about Conley’s death in The World’s Hope for August 1, 1897 was supplied by W I Mann, who up to April 1892 had been a ZWT director.
For the history of individuals, Paton’s magazine
is valuable because in keeping with his views on universal salvation he tried
to keep in touch with or at least report on everyone. The interest was not
generally reciprocated. From an historical sense one it is a pity that his
paper folded in August 1916. A few more
months and he would have no doubt reported on CTR’s life and death as he saw
it.
https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/2013/07/john-patons-farewell.html
The
Spirit of the Word
Another associate, Arthur P Adams,
initially supported Barbour when the split came, but then started a small
circulation paper in 1885 called The
Spirit of the Word.
Adams was a Methodist minister who met CTR
in 1877 and became associated with both him and John Paton and Nelson Barbour.
As a result of unrepentantly expounding Age to Come views he was expelled from
the Methodist ministry in 1878. CTR chose to mention Adams
in the first version of Harvest Siftings published in 1890.
It was
after this, while on a tour of the New England States, that I met Mr. A. P.
Adams, then a young Methodist minister, who became deeply interested and
accepted the message heartily during the week that I preached to his
congregation. Subsequently, I introduced him to little gatherings of interested
ones in neighboring towns, and assisted otherwise, as I could, rejoicing in
another one who, with study, would soon be a co-laborer in the harvest field.
It
wasn’t to last. Later in the reprinted Harvest Siftings (1894):
Mr. Adams espoused the views
of Mr. Barbour and likewise forsook the doctrine of the ransom. And, true to
our interpretation of the parable of the wedding garment as given at the time,
Mr. Barbour and Mr. Adams, having cast off the wedding garment of Christ's
righteousness, went out of the light into the outer darkness of the world on
the subjects once so clearly seen.
CTR obviosuly felt it necessary to mention
Adams because some ZWT readers would also know of his ministry. One example of
this was Ophelia Burroughs. Ophelia wrote letters to ZWT, organized a Dawn
Circle in the absence of suitable males to step up to the mark, and wrote hymns
and poems which the Society published throughout the 1890s and into the 1900s.
It can be confusing because she wrote under several names, including Browning
(her maiden name) and Burroughs (the name of her first husband).
But Ophelia knew Adams. Very well. In April
1905 she went as far as marrying him!
https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/2015/01/ophelia.html
Please read post “Update to the Update” below this one.
Below is a “new” photograph of the Allegheny Bible House family from 1907.
This article is
captioned “The one that got away” because this photograph was not included in
the book The Bible House that was
published back in the autumn.
To read or re-read a
review of that book, please check this older blog post.
https://truthhistory.blogspot.com/2020/11/a-review.html
The new photograph has
only come to light since the book’s publication and will now be included in
future editions.
There is a famous
photograph of the workers at Bible House, in the street outside the entrance,
which dates from 1907. This interior shot was taken around the same time
because it includes most of the same people. Missing from the photograph are
CTR, his sister Margaret Land and also J A Bohnet. The photograph includes
Francis Winter who died on 11 January 1908. This helps to narrow down the time
the picture was taken.
It was taken in the
Bible House parlor. Below is a colorized photograph of the parlor.
Below again is the newly discovered group photograph in the parlor, now colorized and with the names of the people, where known, added below. (You may have to click on the photograph to enlarge it to see all the details).
Issues with my health are slowly being resolved. Some time this month I will be in Spokane for a procedure they cannot do here. This is diagnostic. I do not know why my Doctor wants this additional procedure, but insurance covers it, and if it gives him more confidence so much the better.
The surgery is laparoscopic. It takes about 45 minutes if there are no complications. The cancer is localized and has not spread. Recovery time varies, but I should be able to return to my part-time job in a week or so. There is a - what they think is benign tumor on my right kidney. They may remove that at the same time. That's also a laparoscopic procedure. Growing old is not for sissies, someone once said. I agree.
I'm taking a break from intensive research to focus on doctor visits and pills and easier writing projects. Thanks to everyone who expressed sympathy.
I have a second surgery over another issue. That's in July. It is same day surgery with a very limited recovery time.
Submissions to this blog are open. Same standards as always. Anyone have a well researched article about the Russell v. Russell trials? How about the 1912 world missionary tour? Anyone?
Hi everyone,
Please help me keep this blog alive through your contributions. I was diagnosed with cancer today. No decision on treatment yet. But I will not be able to devote much time to writing, research or this blog for some little while.
(With
grateful thanks to Bernhard who originally provided key information for this
article and Lyn Millner of the Florida Gulf Coast University for the leads on
Koreshanity and Pittsburgh in her entertaining book: The Allure of
Immortality – An American Cult, a Florida Swamp, and a Renegade Prophet.
Expanded from an article published elsewhere, with permission.)
During the times of CTR’s ministry
and the founding of the Watch Tower Society there were individuals once in
association who then left for pastures new. The reasons were many. Some, like
John Paton took the “ransom for all” doctrine to an extra level and became a
Universalist. Some had personal issues as discussed in A Conspiracy
Exposed (1894). There was a split with Ernest Henninges in Australia
1909 (see Yearbook 1983).
In nearly all cases, while a modern
reader may not agree with what they did, they can at least understand what
happened. But the oddest defections occurred in a little known scenario from
the latter half of the 1890s – the move of three men, James Augustus Weimar,
Ulysses Grant Morrow and Henry Nicholas Rahn to join a fairly new religious
movement called The Koreshan Unity.
The Koreshan Unity was founded by
Cyrus Reed Teed (1839-1908). Teed studied medicine and practiced what today
would be viewed as fringe therapies including alchemy and medical electricity.
An encounter with electricity in 1869 rendered him unconscious and when he came
around he believed he’d had a vision telling him he was the Messiah. He now had
a mission to redeem mankind through his scientific knowledge. As part of his
new calling he changed his name to the Hebrew version of Cyrus, namely Koresh.
(Around a hundred years later another prophet called Vernon Howell would
rebrand himself as one David Koresh and die at Waco). The original Koresh,
Cyrus Teed, promoted a unique theology that included reincarnation, celebacy for
certain levels of hierarchy and a version of communism. Perhaps his most
unusual teaching was that the earth is hollow and humans live inside it with
the sun like a giant battery in the middle. (One wonders if Edgar Rice
Burroughs, author of the Tarzan books, got his idea for his Pellucidar series
from reading Koresh.)
The new movement with its Messiah
formed several small communes that eventually came together as a collective
version of New Jerusalem in the Florida town of Estero around 1894. At its peak
the community had around 250 inhabitants, and was well organized and
self-sufficient. They published a magazine called The Flaming Sword.
They also got involved in local politics with their own political party,
although not very successfully.
Teed
aka Koresh died in 1908, as a possible result of injuries sustained in a 1906 fight
between his commune and outsiders. Having claimed he would be raised to heaven,
his followers kept vigil over his body until the public health people stepped
in and insisted on burial. His tomb was then destroyed in a hurricane in 1921
and his coffin, a zinc bath, washed out to sea and lost. A few fragments of Teed were found in a search of the beach, which were stored in the Estero Post Office - which then burned down in 1938. Words like bizarre come to mind.
After Teed’s death, the Koreshan
Unity slowly declined. Their magazine ran until 1949, when a fire at their
printing works ended production. The last official member of the commune died
in 1981. The historical remains of the venture are now a State Park.
Quite how any Watch Tower adherents
became involved is not known, nor can we be sure who was first and who followed.
But they included a Society director and also someone mentioned in fairly
recent Watchtower literature.
The key year was 1895. Teed/Koresh
increasingly entered the consciousness of Pittsburgh residents in the
newspapers of that year. The Pittsburgh Press for 14 March 1895 carried a
satirical cartoon (not attempting a likeness) and poked fun at Koreshan belief.
Teed’s spokesman on this occasion
was a Mr. Morrow (to whom we will return later). The New Jerusalem in Estero
was described and Morrow explained Koreshan theology for the reporter,
including that “none but celebates could become part of the elect sons of God.”
Unsurprisingly the reporter sounded out Mrs. Morrow. When interviewed, she
confessed she “hoped in time to become perfect enough to live a celebate life.”
There was no mention of CTR and the
Bible Students at this stage, but that was soon to change. Teed was back in
town in June. The Pittsburgh Daily Post for 17 June 1895 reviewed his speech at
the Pittsburgh Opera House the night before, attended by about 500. It was on
the front page of the paper and Morrow was again much in evidence. The newspaper
byline dismissed this as “rather a small crowd,” but commended Teed’s skill:
“Dr Teed is rather an impressive
platform orator, He possesses a vigorous form, a strong, expressive face, and a
deep, powerful voice, all of which help wonderfully in the control of an
audience.”
Within just a few weeks the issue between the teachings of Koresh and Zion’s Watch Tower became very public. The Chicago Daily News for August 12, 1895, had a special report from a correspondent in Pittsburgh, dated August 11, 1895. (Teed was still based in Chicago at this point). In the best yellow journalism style, it carried the heading: “Ready to Talk Two Hours or Weeks – Long-winded debates by the Rival Messiahs of Pittsburgh.”
The text read:
“Pittsburgh, Pa., Aug. 11. (Special)
– A war has broken out between rival Messiahs. Dr. Cyrus R. Teed of Chicago,
the renowned Koresh, and C.T. Russell, leader of the Russellites of Allegheny
City, cannot agree, and the charges and countercharges that are made range all
the way from points on religion and science to accusations of indecent conduct.
Teed’s Florida colonization scheme
looks like a winner and the Russellites have been flocking to the banner of
Koresh in such numbers as to alarm their former chief. He issued a circular the
other day that brought Teed here today. Koresh made reply in the shape of a
challenge to Russell to debate the whole question of Messiahism. He is willing
to make it a debate of two hours or two weeks.”
No debate as such ever happened, but
the story was picked up in detail by the Pittsburgh Press for August 14, 1895.
CTR provided a lengthy written
statement for newspaper, which, apart from some theological arguments, they
appear to have printed in full. Much of it features the first of our three
defectors, Augustus Weimar, which the paper calls the Rev. Mr. Weimar.
Before considering the newspaper
account, first, a little background for James August Weimar (1855-1919).
James August Weimar’s photograph from “The Mysteries and Revelation”
Weimar came from Germany to the
States and became interested in the Watch Tower message in 1888. He was a
minister of the German Baptist congregation in Meriden, Connecticut at the
time. By 1889 he was a Watch Tower evangelist mentioned in the pages of Zion’s
Watch Tower. He continued to be mentioned in connection with his support
for CTR’s work up until 1895. During 1895 he was a director of the Watch Tower
Society, replacing J B Adamson on January 5, 1895, and being replaced by E C
Henninges on January 4, 1896.
At some point in 1895 Weimar found
his new spiritual home with the Koreshan Unity. The Flaming Sword published
an attack on CTR and Millennial Dawn in its July 1895 issue.
It started on the front page and ran to three pages in total. It attacked his
position on the ransom as a “corresponding price” and dismissed his theology as
“modern Christianity gone to seed.” This attack was followed by a reprint of a
Nelson Barbour article from Herald of the Morning for November
1891 in The Flaming Sword for September 1895, which sneered at
CTR’s ransom theology as that of a “commercial man” and “commercial gentleman.”
As noted above, there was already a branch of the Koreshan faith meeting
regularly in Allegheny.
It came to a head with what Weimar called AN ALL-DAY CONFERENCE with CTR. We don’t know exactly when it happened, but writing as “Augustus” Weimar reported on it in The Flaming Star for April 1896. He called it “A dispute I had with the compiler of Millennial Dawn, concerning Koresh (whom I believe to be the true Messiah of this age) and his literature.” Weimar insisted that Koresh had wonderful widsom and understanding, and could understand ancient languages fully, better than any recognized lexicographer, even though he’d never had any lessons… He went on to insist that Koresh understood all the prophecies of Old and New Testaments, and (quote) “that to him all the mysteries of the physical and the anthropostic microcosm were open secrets.” The interview did not end well. According to Weimar, CTR said “THAT IS OF THE DEVIL” and Weimar said “Goodbye Mr Russell” and left.
More detail of the split is found in
the aforementioned Pittsburgh Press for August 14, 1895. CTR’s letter to
the newspaper gave the following details as he saw them:
“It is true that J.A. Weimer has
been working in the office of “Zion’s Watch Tower” as a compositor for some
years, working piecework, at 40 cents per M., and averaging about $14 per week,
and I learn that it is true that Mr. Teed has offered him $18 per week of 36
hours.
“It is true, also, that I had a far
better opinion of his education, his reasoning facilities and his heart than to
suppose that he would have the slightest interest in the vagaries and
absurdities of Koreshanity.
“It is true, also, that for some
time Mr. Weimer has been holding some meetings in some nearby towns along lines
which I believe to be biblical. But it is not true that he was either appointed
or paid for such service. His car-fare only was supplied from a volunteer fund
to which he with others contributed.
“From this it will be seen that “The
Post” was misinformed by the Koreshans when told that I had given Mr. Weimer
the “option” of ceasing his investigation into Koreshanity or “leaving the
service in which he was employed as a speaker for several out-of-town
congregations,” for his was neither paid nor employed, and was in no sense in
my service, but voluntarily in the Lord’s service. Nor has there been one
unkind word between us, nor one word with reference to his job as a compositor.
He, however, settled that by failing to report for work on Monday.
Weimar
Saw the Letter
“As for the ‘printed matter
attacking Teed most bitterly;’ about which Teed wanted his people ‘not to be
angry’ if they were ‘persecuted,’ it was a ‘typewritten letter, a copy of which
was handed to Mr. Weimar more than a week before it was sent, that he might
know exactly what we counseled the friends to do respecting his preaching; and
I requested Mr. Weimar to indicate any items not considered true, or for any
reason objectionable to him.
“In this letter I assume no control
over Teed, Weimar or the gatherings of God’s people. The most offered is
reasonable advice, and that in kind and courteous language.
“It is reported that I declined to
discuss differences with Mr. Teed, but this is not the case; for I have never
been ‘approached’ on the subject. I surmise, however, that no good could be
accomplished for Teed, nor for any as blinded as to consider him greater than
Christ. But should it ever become evident to me that any of the Lord’s true
sheep need help, I shall not hesitate to show up the hollowness of the
blasphemous claims of Koreshanity….
“…These blasphemous claims are all
the proofs that I need that the entire theory is of the devil. I care not for
the legerdemain of sophistry by which they were entrapped, and by which they
claim to prove God’s word a lie. It is sufficient to me that this is the faith
and teachings of Koreshans, who receive it from Koresh, whom they call “The
Master,” and before whom they bow…”
“On the one hand we have all the
exceeding great and precious promises of God’s word and our Christian
experiences and growth in grace and knowledge for many years, and our
realization of our Lord’s presence, and feasting with Him upon the things old
and new which He has furnished to His household during the past years of His
presence. On the other hand, we have the bombastic claims of a poor fellow
being of certainly no more than average ability, who has claimed to be able to
make gold for £3 per ton, but who has done nothing but twist a few passages of
scripture fulfilled twenty-four hundred years ago by King Cyrus the Mede, whose
decree let Israel go free from Babylon, so as to make himself ‘somebody,’ and
to practically deny or make void all the remainder of God’s word.
“I learned of Brother Weimar’s
interest in Koreshanity and of his affiliation with its advocates at their
homes. Brother Weimar was present; but declares that he is not committed to
Koreshanity, but says he is trying it, investigating it, proving it. I showed
him in most kindly manner and word some of the absurdities of such a view, and
that there was nothing to prove or weigh. It seems to me, and I believe it will
seem to some of you all, and to Brother Weimar, when you consider it, that he
is at present in no condition to teach others respecting matters of which he is
himself in doubt – not yet decided. I advise, therefore, that any appointments
already out for Brother Weimar be filled by someone else, and that for the
present you excuse Brother Weimar. If desired, I will endeavor to send you
someone else for any meetings already appointed or for others.”
The break between CTR and Weimar was
final, and the latter’s connection with Koreshanity would not be just as
an observer.
When Teed died in 1908 it was Weimar
who led a vigil over the corpse for several days. He was now viewed as Teed’s
doctor, although his speciality was in the fairly new-fangled and unconventional
field of osteopathy.
He stayed a Koreshan believer for
the rest of his life. As the three pictures below from 1914 show, Weimar became
part of The Flaming Sword editorial committee and also
translator of their works into German.
If I have
deciphered the theology correctly, one of their beliefs was that hell was sort
of something inside a person. This allowed for a swipe at Pastor Russell. From
the same 1914 volume:
There is no author given for the
article in question. However, an article carrying Weimar’s name in this same
volume shows that he was one of the inner circle who practiced celibacy. It
should be noted that Weimar’s wife divorced him way back in 1898, citing
his membership as a reason.
At some point he published a book
entitled The Divine and Biblical Credentials of Dr. Cyrus R. Teed
(Koresh). It was republished as recently as 1971 as Koreshanity,
the New Age Religion. Weimer died in 1919 and was buried in the Koreshan
Unity Cemetery in Estero, Florida.
The second name with Watch Tower
connections is Ulysses Grant Morrow (1864-1950). In the above reproduction
from a 1914 Flaming Sword magazine, we can see that Dr. J. A.
Weimar translated into German a publication from the English by a Prof. Morrow.
Ulysses Grant Morrow was born in
Kentucky in 1864, and like many others was named after the Civil War General,
then a hero on the Union side. He married and had two children. He moved to
Iowa where he published and taught his own stenography system. Then at some
point he relocated to Allegheny.
Ulsusses Grant Morrow’s photograph as used in Find a Grave
For the clue that links Morrow to Zion’s
Watch Tower, we must travel forward to March 1936 when The Flaming
Sword attacked him and accused him of plagiarism. The Koreshan Unity
and Morrow had parted company many years before. But the article in passing
takes us back to 1895. The writer (one Allen Andrews) states: “I have known
Ulysses G. Morrow for more than 40 years and for a considerable period was a
co-worker with him…Away back in 1895 Ulysses G. Morrow (then a member of the
C.T. Russell sect) was living in Allegheny, Pa.”
There is one mention of a Brother
Morrow in the pages of Zion’s Watch Tower, in the issue for November
1891. CTR had been away on a trip to Britain and on his return to Allegheny he
wrote: “Brother Bryan and Morrow, a delegation of welcome, met us at the
depot.” On getting to the actual Bible House, there was a service of welcome
conducted by Brother Weimar and Sister Ball read a poem. Brother Bryan would be
Elmer Bryan, soon to leave in the 1894 disagreements. Sister Ball would be Rose
Ball, later Ross Ball Henninges. Brother Weimar we have already met, and it is
probable that Brother Morrow was Ulysses G.
The 1936 attack on Morrow mentioned
he was associated with CTR back in 1895, but if so, he obviously had a foot in
two camps. In The Flaming Sword for May 1895, Morrow wrote a
letter stating he had a file of their magazines going back to 1892, and
addressed his letter to: KORESH, THE MESSENGER OF THE COVENANT – DEAR MASTER
AND SHEPHERD. The letter stated his conversion to “hollow earth” belief (from a
previous “flat earth” belief) and announced that his own magazine would
henceforth promote the Koreshan system.
So there in Allegheny, right under
the nose of The Bible House, Morrow went to work. As noted above he appears to
have been the spokesman for Teed in his April 1895 visit, and regular meetings
at Morrow’s Allegheny home for the “Branch Assembly of the Arch-Triumphant”
were announced in The Flaming Sword from July 1895 onward. He also produced a
new paper called Salvator – Scientist which started in
September that year.
Morrow did
not stay in Allegheny long. He soon relocated to the newly formed Koreshan
commune in Estero. He took over editorial duties for The Flaming Sword which
swallowed up the Salvator – Scientist. He also invented a special
piece of equipment called a Rectilineator that could be used in a straight line
on a beach to establish the curve of the earth. In 1897 at Naples Beach, not
far from the Estero commune, they conducted an experiment which convinced them
even more that the earth’s curve was concave, not convex – so yes, mankind
really was inside a hollow earth with the sun as a giant battery in the center.
It was blindingly obvious.
Morrow
lived until 1950 and his son lived on until 1988. One wonders how they coped
with “hollow earth” belief as the years went by, especially into the era of
rockets and space travel.
The third
member of our trinity of Watch Tower defectors was Henry Nicholas Rahn
(1858-1933) who has actually been mentioned by name in recent Watchtower
literature.
Henry Nicholas Rahn’s photograph from Koreshan archives
Henry Rahn and Augustus Weimar
obviously had connections. Weimar came from Germany, and was previously a
Baptist and at one point was reported to have lived in Baltimore, Maryland.
Rahn also came from Germany, and had been a Baptist pastor, and also lived in
Baltimore. Both certainly knew each other. Baltimore Baptists and then Bible
Students at the same time, they both then became Koreshan Unity supporters at
around the same time. They both stayed with the new movement for the rest of
their lives.
Rahn
was a married man with at least six children. His oldest son was Claude who will
enter our story shortly. In the 1880 and 1900 census returns Henry’s
occupation was as a clerk.
The modern reference to Rahn in
Watchtower literature is found in the book God’s Kingdom Rules (published
2014) on page 174, in paragraph 13. Rahn is credited with the suggestion used
for group meetings that CTR endorsed. The relevant passage reads: “In
the mid-1890’s, after a number of volumes of Millennial Dawn had
been released, Brother H. N. Rahn, a Bible Student living in the city of
Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A., suggested holding “Dawn Circles” for Bible study.”
The original reference comes from
the September 15, 1895 ZWT. It is part of an article by CTR recommending how to
conduct meetings, and states that Rahn’s suggestion for Dawn Circles dated back
to earlier in the decade. The reference reads: “Such meetings for the study of
the Word in the light of the now revealed plan of the ages have been termed Dawn
Circles. The plan originated with Brother Rahn, of Baltimore, several
years ago, and he and the other members of the class report much profit
therefrom.”
Rahn’s name had already occurred
several times in the ZWT’s pages by the time of the Sepember 1895 quote. He
probably became interested in the Bible Student message in the late 1880s,
around the same time as Augustus Weimar. His name occurs in ZWT for May 1892,
April 15, 1893, June 11, 1894, and March 15, 1895. Finally, there is the
aforementioned September 15, 1895 reference. However, immediately thereafter
Rahn disappeared from Watch Tower history. In that year, 1895, he left
association with the Bible Students and spent the rest of his life as an
advocate of the Koreshan Unity.
Henry Rahn died in 1933 and his
obituary was published in The Flaming Sword for August 1933,
page 13: "The sad news has been received from Baltimore of the death,
after a long illness, of Mr. Henry N. Rahn, father of Brothers Claude and Frank
Rahn, in his seventy-fifth year. Mr. Rahn was a staunch Koreshan and earnestly
endeavored to further the Cause in his native city of Baltimore since accepting
Koreshanity in 1895. Meetings were frequently held at his house to discuss the
doctrine; and whenever KORESH visited Baltimore he was a welcome guest at the
hospitable home of Mr. and Mrs. Rahn. Mr. Rahn is survived by his wife, five
sons and a daughter."
Rahn’s defection from Watch Tower therefore
occurred in the same year he was credited by CTR for suggesting Dawn Circles.
Rahn was to remain close to Koresh. On June 21st 1899, he
received the book The Cellular Cosmogony from him. Cyrus R
Teed wrote a dedication inside it, to: “H N Rahn, Pastor of the Church
Triumphant in Baltimore,” a name used for local meetings there. Teed identified
himself as the “Founder of the Koreshan Unity” and considerately added a new
alternative date, A.K. 60 – Anno Koresh. He was sixty years old at the time.
We have mentioned above that Teed
was seriously injured in a street fight in 1906 between his supporters and
local townspeople. Teed was actually at the depot to meet a train from
Baltimore that was bringing some of the Rahn family to visit. Both Henry and
son Claude were part of the ensuing fracas. Teed was pistol whipped by a town
marshall and Claude got himself arrested.
Although Henry Rahn lived most of
his life in Baltimore, son Claude was to live at the Estero commune for some
years and wrote a biography of Teed/Koresh. He was also briefly the Vice
President of the dwindling Koreshan association. He lived until 1973. Like
Morrow’s son, you wonder how he coped with the advancing knowledge of the space
age.
The above then is a story of three
men who ceased working with CTR and the Watch Tower and made what appear to be
off the wall choices of religious direction. All in all, when examining this
history, you get the impression that CTR may have breathed a big sigh of relief
when they parted company with the Watch Tower Society.