Friday, December 23, 2016
Tuesday, December 20, 2016
1881 - VERY temporary post
Usual stuff. You may copy for your own use. Do not share. This is work in progress. It may change. Further research may show some of it unreliable. Comments are welcome. Footnotes deleted from this version for ease of posting.
Remainder of the post has been deleted.
Approach to Eighteen
Eighty-One
The subject we consider in
this chapter is much distorted without context. America with much of the
Christian world was religious. Faith was serious business. If churches differed
in doctrine, sometimes hated each other condemning others to a fiery Hell –
Protestants listened to the Scripture’s prophetic voice. Historians who write
about this period tend to focus on extremist and Adventist movements. But
interest in prophecy was not limited to fringe movements. It was a main-stream
phenomenon. Baptists of various stripe, Anglicans, Presbyterians and nearly
everyone else had well defined interest in prophetic fulfillment. Some Catholic
writers believed Christ’s return impended. In 1881, a French priest, Charles
Arminjon, published a series of lectures predicting the near return of Jesus,
translated into English and published at The End of the Present World, and
the Mysteries of the Future Life.
Remainder of the post has been deleted.
Volunteer?
We need every WT use of the phrases "changed condition" and "change of condition" from 1920 to 1950. If you have the searchable disks and time to find this, we would be grateful.
Monday, December 19, 2016
Thanks!
Our request for reviews resulted in a few. Some from long time readers of this blog. And I think Sergio and Bruce posted on an older forum years ago. Thanks to all.
To meet an Amazon standard and make our book more visible, we need slightly more than 20 reviews. We have seven, all very positive and very flattering. If you haven't done so, please leave a review on Amazon.
Google books, lulu, B&N and some regional sellers take reviews too.
R
To meet an Amazon standard and make our book more visible, we need slightly more than 20 reviews. We have seven, all very positive and very flattering. If you haven't done so, please leave a review on Amazon.
Google books, lulu, B&N and some regional sellers take reviews too.
R
Useful links Herman Heinfetter
https://books.google.com/books?id=PYsEAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Herman+Heinfetter&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjq_bmh-__QAhWl64MKHeS-DQMQ6AEIHTAA#v=onepage&q=Herman%20Heinfetter&f=false
https://books.google.com/books?id=oYAEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA1&dq=Herman+Heinfetter&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjq_bmh-__QAhWl64MKHeS-DQMQ6AEIPzAG#v=onepage&q=Herman%20Heinfetter&f=false
https://archive.org/details/aliteraltransla00unkngoog
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/herman-heinfetter/an-english-version-of-the-new-testament-1864/paperback/product-15739159.html
https://books.google.com/books?id=oYAEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA1&dq=Herman+Heinfetter&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjq_bmh-__QAhWl64MKHeS-DQMQ6AEIPzAG#v=onepage&q=Herman%20Heinfetter&f=false
https://archive.org/details/aliteraltransla00unkngoog
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/herman-heinfetter/an-english-version-of-the-new-testament-1864/paperback/product-15739159.html
Saturday, December 17, 2016
Can You Help?
by Jerome
Rachael
has several times bemoaned the fact that few have written reviews of Separate
Identity, volume one. As an attempt to raise awareness of this book, as well as
the current work in progress, I am joining in asking if you can possibly help
the project in this way.
Over
recent years, a number of people have left comments on the blog, and this has
been really appreciated. If everyone who felt moved to send a comment, could
also send a review to the key sites, Amazon, Lulu, etc. that would really give
the project the increased recognition it needs.
In
addition there are an increasing number of readers worldwide. You read what is
here but may not add a comment, because quite often posts ask for specialised
information and you feel you cannot help. But you still could write your own
review, based on your own feelings about what you have read.
It
doesn’t have to be a long review. Many reviews on these sites are quite brief,
although obviously feel free to do whatever you wish. And if you wish to use a
pseudonym then that is fine. This is what I have done for the three reviews I
have posted on different sites.
There
are several books covering this ground out there, and some have received a lot
more publicity than this project. But they all have an obvious agenda, either in
attack or defence, and crucially, are often riddled with inaccuracies.
Repeating oft told tales from secondary sources does not suddenly make them
right. What the Separate Identity authors have done is go back to primary
sources where they exist, and to search out what no-one else knew did exist. And
then they have attempted to be as even-handed and as objective as is possible.
As someone who strives to write “neutrally” - even though like everyone else I
have my own point of view on some matters - I appreciate the authors’ general
approach.
So
where to review? The biggest site of all has to be Amazon. Actually, Amazon is a
number of sites, because different countries have their own version that
publish country-specific reviews and in their own languages. So why not check
yours? See what has been written - if anything. If there are reviews there, can
you add another? If there are no reviews at all as yet, can you be a
groundbreaker? I note that Rachael asks people to post to the American Amazon
site. The problem here is that if you are using your own country-specific
Amazon site, the American reviews do not show up on it, unless you are
motivated to go looking for them. Using a belt and braces approach, if you
write a review, why not try and post it on both.
Realistically
these books are not going to be best-sellers, although I know Rachael would
love them to be. Best-sellers tend to be overblown fiction or lucky school text
books. Unless you are hit by an extreme fluke, if you want to make real money, get
a “proper job.” But they add to knowledge in a specialised field. That should
be its own reward, although covering research costs from sales is an obvious
plus, and helps to fund continuing investigation.
So
what about it? If you enjoyed Separate Identity and found it of value, then
spend a few minutes and say so. If you have a possible comment to make on an
existing review out there, then make it. I admit that I rarely read all the
reviews on materials I might purchase, but I do notice the volume of reviews
and the starring system that sites use.
So
again - can you help?
As
a“filler”, below is one of the reviews I wrote a couple of years ago. To issue
the standard sort of disclaimer, the opinions expressed in this review are the
writer’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the blog owners.
This is the history or rather the pre-history
of the Bible Student movement associated with Charles Taze Russell. He founded
a magazine (still published today) originally called Zion’s Watch Tower and
Herald of Christ’s Presence. It started in 1879, and yet this first lengthy
volume only takes the reader up to that year. There is a massive untold story
before that year, and this is the only volume to my knowledge that really does
that justice.
Schulz and de Vienne try hard to be accurate and fair to all concerned. The problem with history is that we all tend to come at it with preconceptions. Perhaps the biggest error we make – even unconsciously - is to try and graft our modern sensibilities onto those of the 19th century. Of course, people are people in any era, but only when you understand the background of the times can you appreciate some of the things they believed and did. And rather than swing between the extremes of adulation and criticism, to understand where they were coming from in all sincerity AT THE TIME.
Also the ideas of Charles Taze Russell did not
exist in a vacuum, and this volume brings back to life many of the people he
associated with. At the time he willingly gave them credit, but this has tended
to be lost as the years have rolled by and the focus has concentrated on one
man – a focus distorted by incomplete data. This book has attempted to right
that situation.
In recent years there have been several books covering this ground, generally far more sympathetic than past attempts with a specific religious agenda. But for sheer minutia of research, backed up by references of the time, this book is ground breaking. Don’t take my word for it, if you have any interest in this subject or in the general ambience of those times, get it and read it for yourself. Whether your personal beliefs match or differ from these men of 150 years ago, it will complete many pieces of a jigsaw that you likely never knew existed.
Rachael adds: Another place to leave a review [hopefully a positive one] is here http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/a-separate-identity-b-w-schulz/1119584341
Friday, December 16, 2016
REVIEWS
Posting a review on Amazon or googlebooks or lulu.com helps us. Few have done it. You don't like our books? We finance our research out of pocket and from sales. Reviews help sales.
Twenty more reviews will materially help us with Amazon. Will you do it?
Update: Remember to post your review to the USA Amazon site. Reviews posted on other sites do not show up on the main site.
Twenty more reviews will materially help us with Amazon. Will you do it?
Update: Remember to post your review to the USA Amazon site. Reviews posted on other sites do not show up on the main site.
Wednesday, December 14, 2016
CTR's brother-in-law, Lemuel Ackley
When Maria married CTR at her mother’s residence on
March 13, 1879 (service conducted by John H Paton) her younger brother, Lemuel,
was likely one of the guests. Unfortunately, the modern practice of group
photos for weddings was not applied to this particular wedding, so we are left
with supposition. However, Lemuel was born in Allegheny in 1857 and is found in
the census returns there for 1870 and 1880.
The photograph comes from the volume Chicago Biography
from c. 1891. The text mentions that he had been a reporter on the Pittsburgh
Dispatch and Pittsburgh Commercial Gazette from around 1879-1883. He then went
to Law School in Michigan from 1883-1885, and moved to Chicago in 1887.
When Maria left CTR she first went to Chicago to
stay with Lemuel.
Lemuel death made the news. He was murdered in court
by a disgruntled police sergeant in 1921. The story is found in the New York
Evening World for July 29, 1921. One wonders whether Maria traveled to the
funeral.
Early Italian Tract - An article by Roberto
With English language help from Rachael
In
1911 (or soon after), the Italian Watch Tower branch published a four-page tract
entitled: “Dando Ascolto alle Dottrine dei Demoni” (Listening to the Doctrines
of Demons). The caption under the picture reads: “Gehenna, which symbolized final
destruction.”
The Tract begins this way:
“LISTENING TO THE DOCTRINES OF DEMONS by C. T. Russell, 1911
The angels which kept not their first estate. Jude 6.
Today very few believe to the Bible statement that the earthly atmosphere is infested by evil spirits. And as a result of this incredulity, thousands of right-minded people are easily deceived by this evil spirits. The fog is together physical and moral. The usual method of these spirits is to arise (stir up, excite) curiosity ....”
The article’s subtitles are:
- They teach false doctrines
- Ready for these deceivers
- Seductive Spirits, fiendish doctrines
- Libidinousness of the fallen angels
- Confined angels, dark chains
- Enemies of God and men
- Jesus drove the devils out
- Scientists fall into the traps
A second and short article is entitled: “A Rare Case.” It reports of thirty-three Catholic priests of Canada that left the church. They denounce seven Catholic doctrines that conflict with the Bible. It looks like false news.
The third article is entitled: “The appeal of the Angel of Laodicea”. It is a treatment of Revelation 3:14, applied to Russell.
Can
anyone tell me the original Watch Tower publication of the first article? The
year seems to be 1911.
[Editor’s
note: The last article would mark this tract as from after 1917. – R]
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
Reviews
We need more Amazon reviews, preferably good ones. Twenty would be nice. If you liked our book, review it on Amazon, please.
Tuesday, December 6, 2016
Volunteer?
I've found the text of a 'forgotten' debate from 1920. We need someone to transcribe it. This represents a lot of work. Anyone?
Monday, December 5, 2016
Questions
Many of the questions asked on this blog or sent to us through email can be answered by consulting one of the digitized libraries of Watch Tower publications.
Sunday, December 4, 2016
Friday, December 2, 2016
Wednesday, November 30, 2016
Inside Bible House 1889-1908
Several in the comment trail and back-channel have
enquired about the rooms inside the Bible House and asked if photographs exist.
With very grateful thanks to Bernhard (who has done
all the work on this), below is a picture of the building along with seventeen extra
photographs taken at the site prior to the move to Brooklyn in 1909. Ideally, you
will need to transfer the graphic into a program like Microsoft Office Picture
Manager, and then you can increase it to a readable size. You can also then select
and separate the individual photographs if you wish.
Some additional comments about the second floor of
the building will follow this.
The previous description of Bible House mentioned
that the second floor was rented out for commercial purposes. This information
came from Dr Leslie Jones (who produced the convention reports 1904-1916). His
memories of visiting Bible House and the layout were written in 1929. However,
it seems that only part of the floor was rented out because Watch Tower offices
like the Colporteur Department were on this floor. Below is a picture of part
of the second floor from both outside and inside the building to establish
this.
However, a check of trade directories of the day
show that various businesses, including insurance and music teaching, as well
as some probably connected to CTR at some point, were also carried on from the
Arch Street address. So it would seem the second floor was used by both the
Watch Tower Society and other interests. With over 2500 square feet per floor it
would be large enough to accommodate both.
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
End of Bible House
Probably from the Pittsburgh Press in 1963 and probably written by George Swetnam, this is the story about the end of the Bible House building.
With grateful thanks to S P Olsen who sent it in.
Location of Bible House
In response to the question on the previous post on Bible House, I have been sent a map of modern Allegheny/Pittsburgh, where the red dot shows the former location of the building. The nearest street is West Commons Street.
You may need to enlarge the picture to see the streets more clearly.
For these kind of queries I can recommend the book 'Watch Tower of Allegheny Historical Tour' which is available from Amazon and other places. Google and ye shall find.


















