We really would like some comments on this. Real feedback, knowlegeable feeback if possible, is helpful.
Out of
The
nature of Russell era congregations is misstated by Biblically illiterate
historians and sociologists. Edward Abrahams asserted that “Russell used the
words ‘alienated,’ ‘isolated,’ and ‘troubled’ to describe his congregations.” We
ask, where?
Between
1879 and the end of 1916, the word alienated appears in fifty-nine
issues of the Watch Tower . Watch
Tower writers and Russell especially use it as commentary on Colossians
1:21-23: “And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by
wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled In the body of his flesh through
death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight: If
ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the
hope of the gospel, which ye have heard , and which was preached to every
creature which is under heaven.” This is not a statement of social alienation,
but of the need for reconciliation with God through Jesus.
The
word appears in quotations from other sources, usually as commentary on the
alienation of the young from contemporary churches and the Bible. These are not
a reference to Watch Tower congregations. Russell never uses the word alienated
in the sense meant by a sociologist. The one place where one might presume he
meant it in that sense is found in the January 15, 1912 , Watch Tower . Russell
wrote:
The Church has cried in "the wilderness" in
the sense that she has been alienated and separated from the world. She has
called upon all who would hear to prepare for Messiah's Kingdom. She has told
more fully than did John the Baptist of the effect of Messiah's Kingdom – the
leveling up of the valleys (the lifting up of the poor), the straightening out
of the crooked things and the smoothing of the rough things, that thus all
flesh might see, appreciate, understand, experience the salvation of God. Both
John and the Church declare that this salvation is to be brought through Jesus
and His glorified Bride in Kingdom power. The point we are making is that while
John the Baptist was an antitype of Elijah, and was forerunner or herald of
Jesus, so, only more particularly, the Church in the flesh is a higher antitype
of Elijah, and still more particularly a herald of the Messianic Kingdom.
Did
Russell suggest that the congregations were socially alienated? Not in the way
Abrahams and others suggest, and certainly this one occurrence is not an
example of continual usage. Russell says the Church has no part in the world’s
social upheavals and essential sinfulness. But the Church has an obligation to
the world to uplift, to declare salvation, and to rebuke wrongdoing. Christians
are not to approve of the world’s ways. This is not similar to the social
alienation that led to the Haymarket affair or the Railroad Insurrection. This
is a push for holiness.
But what of Russell’s use of the
word “isolated”? When using it of Watch Tower adherents, especially in the very early days, Russell
meant those who were the lone believer in their area, not that they were
otherwise isolated from their communities. An example is found in the October
1881 Watch Tower . Russell wrote an extensive report on the progress of Watch Tower evangelism “To strengthen and encourage the lonely
and isolated ones.” Reporting Communion
observance in 1884, he touched on the small number of believers, using the word
‘isolated’: “In some places only two or three assembled, in others more, and
some isolated individuals alone, but the general testimony is that the Master
was present at least in spirit; and for aught we know was personally present.”
Does this seem to be a reference to social isolation? Not to us. But, as we
shall explore, their unique beliefs left them separated partly or wholly from
the religious community. Again in 1884, Russell wrote:
It
is comforting to those who stand isolated in their own neighborhood to realize
this. There are many such isolated ones, and all have much the same experience
–
in
the world, tribulation; in Christ, peace. It is also a source of encouragement
to learn that while we realize that the harvest is great the laborers are being
multiplied, and that so far as we can learn, the saints are realizing their
call to make known the glad tidings, and that though their talents be many or
few they are not to be folded away in a napkin. We have learned that there are
as many ways to preach the Gospel as there are talents among the saints.
We
rejoice with all these that we have been so enabled to comprehend the Gospel as
to find that out of the abundance of the heart our mouth must speak; that the
love of Christ and the knowledge of his glorious truth constraineth us.
But
while we thus rejoice together, we can but rejoice with trembling as we realize
the secret, subtle, and persevering efforts of the Prince of this world to
overcome the saints. No artifice or effort is left untried: Opposition,
ridicule, rejection, flattery, false reasoning to disprove the truth, cares of
this world, bribery with the good things of this world, and allurements of
various kinds, are all used as the necessities of the individual cases may
require.
This is within Christian experience.
Early Methodists and Baptists, and First Century Christians all experienced
isolation because of belief. Plymouth Brethren chose it for the sake of pure
belief. The trials Russell described are common to those who live by New
Testament standards. Some sociologists believe this is harmful. Adherents in
this era felt the isolation, but the counter to it was suggested in this
article. Because they were ‘true believers’, they were also evangelists,
expressing their beliefs to others. There is no alienation in this. They were
determined to speak as God would have them speak, to bring the gospel to any
who would hear.
Russell was aware of this dichotomy.
Isolated from “worldly” belief and practice by the desire for holiness and
divine approval, adherents also felt compelled to take the Gospel to others.
Drawn on his experiences with Watch Tower believers, he wrote:
But
where is this faithful Church to be found? – this people so set apart from the
world, so faithful, so loyal and so true? – so ready always to recognize and
accept the Lord's help? Does it gather here or there or yonder? and is God manifestly
in the midst of its congregation as evidenced by its joyous songs and fervent prayers?
Ah, no! it is a scattered flock; so much so that the world does not discover
that there is such a people. The world knows them only as isolated and peculiar
individuals who cannot assimilate even with the masses of those who bear the
name of Christ. There is one in the quiet of country life whose chief interest is
not in the harvest of his earthly crops, and who only plants and reaps thus
that he may be able to devote himself so far as possible to the reaping of
God's harvest. He has glorious tidings for his neighbors far and near, of the
kingdom which is soon to be established in the earth. And there is a farmer's
wife: in the midst of her busy cares the blessed sound of gospel grace has
fallen on her ears. She feels at once like dropping the domestic duties and
going abroad to tell the good news. But no; she remembers the Lord's teaching,
that he that provideth not for his own house is worse than an unbeliever; and
so she says, I will let my light shine here. These little ones around my feet
shall learn to rejoice in the truth; my companion, my neighbors, my farm hands
and all that I can reach through the mail or the press shall know of it; and
all these domestic duties which I realize the Lord would not have me ignore
shall henceforth be done with an eye single to his glory.
Here
is an invalid and there is an aged saint. Their faith in the Word of God,
regardless of the vain philosophies and traditions so commonly accepted, brings
upon them many reproaches which are meekly born for Christ's sake, while they
humbly endeavor to let their light shine upon those about them. And yonder in a
crowded city are a few who dare to be peculiar – to separate themselves from
the customs and habits of social life, to forego the pleasures and present advantages
of former social ties, to speak the new and heavenly language, to sing their songs
of hope and praise and by every agency within their grasp to send forth the
glorious message of the coming kingdom. And then scattered far and near are
some unencumbered with earthly cares and joyfully denying themselves, esteeming
it a privilege to devote all their time and energy to the great harvest work. Yes,
"the Lord knoweth them that are his," and he is in the midst of them.
He knows their loyalty to him and they know his voice and are ever ready to
follow his leading. Thus no harm can overtake them. They will stand and not
fall, and will in the end be crowned as victors. A thousand will fall at their
side and ten thousand at their right hand in this day of trial, but they will
be kept in the very midst of the wildest confusion. They may, as the trial
proceeds and as the faint-hearted and unfaithful fall, be left to stand almost
or entirely alone in their several localities; but then they will realize all
the more the preciousness of being alone with God.
Strict adherence to Bible standards,
no matter what the doctrine, has always produced something like this. It is
hard for us to see Watch Tower adherents in the Russell era as social misfits in the
same sense that those at the extremes of the labor movement and other
disenfranchised groups were. Former slaves and their children, poor farmers,
under paid and abused laborers, shop girls who prostituted themselves because
they were not paid a fair wage suffered from forces outside their control.
Separation form ‘the world’ on a doctrinal and holiness basis was a choice. Put
in Apostolic terms, either one served God or was part of the world.
In 1892, Russell wrote a commentary
on the International Sunday School Lesson on the First Pslam. Russell said that
the righteous man of Psalm One pictured “the man whose heart is perfected in
holiness, the pure in heart.” This was “pre-eminently” a picture of Jesus, but “secondarily
… of those … justified by faith … new creatures, walking in their Master's
footsteps.” They were “sometimes imperfect” through fleshly weakness. The Psalm
delineates “three steps” the righteous avoid: “(1) the ungodly – literally, the
wicked, (2) sinners or transgressors, and (3) scorners or the conceited and
unteachable.” “The proper course is to have no fellowship (sympathy and common
interest) with people of any of these classes,” Russell wrote. He explained
that this “not mean that we are to treat them unkindly or discourteously, nor
that we are never to be seen walking, standing or sitting with such; but it
does imply that our company should, as far as possible, be select, and of those
who reverence our God, and that other fellowships should not be encouraged.”
Of the three types of wrong-doers Russell identified,
he felt most would avoid the unquestionably wicked and common sinners. Most
were “in danger of getting into fellowship with the scorners or unteachable.”
Association with them would lead “to the same spirit, and that leads gradually
to violation of the covenant with God; and that leads to open wickedness and willful
sin.” The safe way is to have was to have “no fellowship with darkness: it is
never profitable.” The principals in the first Psalm affected church
affliation:
In
all the nominal churches there are many who have a form of godliness, but who are
really ungodly – far from being in harmony with God and his plan. In the
nominal churches are also many sinners, living in known violation of their
covenant with God. And there, too, may be found, alas! sometimes even in the
pulpits, those who are of an unteachable, haughty spirit, who even scoff at
God's Word and make it void through their traditions. Come out from among them;
and neither sit, nor stand, nor walk in fellowship with such. (Rev. 18:4; Isa.
52:11.) Stand with God, even if that should seem to imply standing alone. The
Lord knoweth them that are his, and he has yet more than seven thousand who bow
not to the idol of sectarianism.
Obedience to principals of good
fellowship brought happiness rather than isolation:
Some
might suppose that one thus isolated would have an unhappy lot; but no, he is
truly said to have a delightful experience. He delights day and night in
meditating upon God's will and plan. In this he finds a joy and a peace which
the world and a worldly church can neither give nor take away. One thus
consecrated and full of the spirit of the Lord finds that God's laws of
righteousness are not restraints which he would fain be freed from; but, like
the Master, he can say, "I delight to do thy will, O my God: thy law is
engraven in my heart."
…
Such children of God as have reached this degree of development do not wither
away and become dead and barren, but, since the root of their new life is fed
by the river of God's grace and truth, they are always fresh and joyous and
fruitful--adding to faith virtue, brotherly kindness, love, and so are not unfruitful
in either the knowledge or the wisdom which surely comes to all who have
communion and fellowship with God. Whatsoever such do shall prosper. They have
no plans of their own: they desire that God's will shall be done. And since
God's plan shall prosper (Isa. 55:11), their plan shall prosper; for his is
theirs.
Again
we observe that this is not the disenfranchisement that Abrahams and others who
take the same tack envision. It is engagement but on terms set by holiness. If
the world is common and ungodly, it is not association of choice for Christians,
but it is populated by those who need to hear the gospel and to whom Christians
owe courteous behavior. Some historians and more sociologists take this and
similar comments to mean Watch Tower adherents were disenfranchised and disgruntled. They
misunderstand the religious spirit of the age.
Samuel
L. Beiler, a professor at Boston College , a Methodist institution, also wrote a commentary on
this psalm suggesting much the same things as Russell did:
The
scorners are those who make an open scoff at religion, and blaspheme and
ridicule it. These … are as many now as in Psalmist’s day. They still have
their ‘seat’ or assembly and form a deliberate confederacy in wickedness. To ‘sit’
in their ‘seat’ does not necessitate being an open-mouthed blasphemer, but may
only imply a silent member of such a company, who in his own heard … harbors
such feeling. Beware of mocking, ridiculing, scoffing, scorning sacred things.
Such a spirit indicates a heart empty of good and of god, near to destruction. …
The ungodly … will be as the chaff blown away by the wind. … In the great day
of judgment the hearts that are like empty shells will be found wanting …
Those more modern writers who
suggest that Watch Tower believers were especially alienated from the world
are significantly out of touch with the religious spirit of the age. Watch Tower theology – on the issue of holiness and obligations
to fellow men – fits directly into common religious belief. To return to
Abrahams’ suggestions, we should note that the third term he suggested, “troubled,”
does not seem to us to have been used in the sense he suggests. Since he cites
no references, we cannot follow his research trail.
Zion’s Watch Tower and
traveling evangelists served as point of contact from the “twos and threes” and
individuals. Hamilton Lincoln Gillis wrote to Russell from Preston County , West
Virginia , after
the Lord’s Memorial Supper in 1887, noting concern for the small groups.
Russell printed it in the May Watch Tower :
I
have the great pleasure to report a very interesting and profitable meeting, on
the evening of the 7th inst., of a little company, sixteen in number, who “kept
the feast” in remembrance of “our Passover, slain for us.” We remembered the
more isolated ones, who were not so privileged; also the little bands of twos
and threes, and companies like our own, here and there all over the earth. We
prayed also for the dear brothers and sisters in Allegheny; and we doubted not
that we were also remembered, and the assurance gave us courage and
strengthened us in our glorious privilege. We all join in sending our love and
sympathy to you and Sister Russell, and to all the dear household that are
privileged to see you face to face.
[1] E. H. Abrahams: Charles Taze Russell and the Jehovah’s
Witnesses, American Studies, Spring 1977, page 61.
[2] C. T. Russell: Prepare Ye for the Kingdom, The Watch
Tower, January 15, 1912 ,
pages 32-33.
[3] C. T. Russell: In the Vineyard, Zion’s Watch Tower,
October/November 1881, page 5.
[4] C. T. Russell: View from the Tower, Zion’s Watch
Tower, August 1884, page 1.
[5] C. T. Russell: God is in the Midst of Her, Zion’s
Watch Tower, August 1891, pages 108-109.
[6] C. T. Russell: The King of Zion, Zion’s Watch Tower,
March 15, 1892 , pages
90-91.
[7] Beiler’s commentary if found in: Boston
Homilies: Short Sermons on the International Sunday School Lessons for 1892,
page 113ff.
[8] Letter from H. L. Gillis to Russell, Zion’s Watch
Tower, May 1887, page 8. [Not in reprints.] Gillis was born in Pittsburgh ,
Pennsylvania , June 1836 to Ander and Isabelle Gillis. About 1857 he married
Isabel Crawford. They had four children. During the Civil War he served as a
private in the 6th Regiment, West Virginia Cavelry (Union). Though some online genealogies say he died in
1916, he died in 1906. Gillis traveled to Austraila in the late 1890s to mine
for opals. On his return, they were stolen from him by an Aleck Cramer.
[Swindled by his Friend, San Francisco Call, March 10, 1898] He returned
to West Virginia.
3 comments:
Dear Brothers,
I'm an Italian Brother from Turin. I really really appreciate your blog. I'm an Organization history amateur, and I think yor work is fantastic!
Alessandro Verdini
alecverdini@gmail.com
Ho letto con apprezzamento questo articolo che oltre a fare un esame delle critiche infondate mosse a Russell ed ai primi Studenti Biblici ne fa rivivere il clima genuino e fresco nel quale si sviluppava l'attività.
Un sincero ringraziamento per la qualità di questi articoli e per l'ottimo lavoro di traduzione di Roberto.
Thank you for your valuable work. It is very interesting and instructive.
Takes us back in time and memory: this is our spiritual heritage.
Post a Comment