Conley, Faith Cure and Money
While the prophetic
failures of 1881 precipitated division, they were not the prime cause. Paton’s deflection centered on declining influence and a return to his
universalist belief. From the beginning, he and Russell were separated by their
beliefs, and separation was inevitable. Jones sought in rejection of key
portions of the Bible an excuse for behaviors few Christians would accept. William
Conley’s slow, painful withdrawl from Watch Tower association dates to the same
year, but there is no evidence to suggest it was related to failed prophetic
expectations. Russell connected it to status and finance:
The nearest we ever came
to asking money from any convinced us that such a course is wholly contrary to
the Lord's will. That instance was in 1881, when over a million copies of “Food
for Thinking Christians” were published and circulated. We then remembered a
Brother, who was well-to-do, and who had repeatedly shown a deep interest in
the cause, and who had said to us, “Brother R____, whenever you see something
good, something specially calculated to spread the light and needing money,
something in which you intend to invest, let me know of it – count me in on all
such enterprises;” and we merely laid the matter before him, explaining the
plan and the amount of money that could be used, without making any direct
request. The Brother gave liberally, yet apparently the offering brought him
only a partial blessing. And, perhaps from fear that we would call further
opportunities to his notice, and from a lack of full appreciation of our
motives in the matter or of the light in which we regarded it (as a favor
toward him to let him know of the opportunity), that Brother has gone backward
and lost much of his former interest. How much the above circumstance had to do
with his decline of interest we know not, but it doubly strengthened and
guarded us on a point on which we were already well settled, namely, that no
direct and personal appeals should be made to any in our Lord's name. All the
gold and silver is his. He neither begged nor commissioned any to beg for him.[1]
This is an obvious reference to Conley. We should note
that Russell continues to call him ‘brother’ in 1890, revealing a continuing
relastionship he did not have with Barbour, Paton or Jones. But as a brother,
Conley had taken a step backwards. Russell saw Conley’s four thousand dollar
donation to the tract work as liberal and speculated that fear of further calls
on his wealth caused Conley to withdraw.
Evidence
suggests that Russell mistook the nature of Conley’s “deep interest.” Conley supported
many religious causes, including those whose beliefs differed from his own. He
gave room in his home for Paton to lecture, but in 1894 he wrote to Russell saying:
“As to myself, you an rely on one thing; viz.; All report stating that I deny
the ransom are aboslutely false. The no-ransom people may talk, but they ‘have
nothing in me.’”[2]
Conley advertised in Jones Day Star, but we think it was recoup money owed to
Conley & Ritter, rather than as support for Jones’ later views. The Conleys
supported alternative religious movements in various ways out of a sense of ‘doing
good.’
Russell
is correct when he suggests that Conley did not appreciate his motives. Conley
was a religious gad fly. He did not share many of Russell’s beliefs. He was not
committed to an urgent last days’ message. While Russell was divesting himself
of commercial interests, Conley was cultivating his. The Allegheny belivers
were diverse, and Conley’s last religious belief suggests he retained his
millennialist Lutheran beliefs throughout the years he associated with Russell.[3]
What united them was a belief in the nearness of final judgment. They were not
united in most basic doctrine, and when they were their emphasis was different.
Much of Conley’s drift away from Zion’s Watch Tower is due to this shift
in emphasis.
Faith Cure
The faith cure movement as expressed in this era come to
America from Germany and Switzerland, but it took on a distinctivly American
flavor. Russell encountered it at least by 1878 when me met Jenny Smith at the New
York City Prophetic Conference. As you will recall from volume one of this
work, Smith believed herself cured by faith. Russell was interested, if not in
her personally, at least in her claims. Other Watch Tower associates were
interested too, and the topic was discussed in The Watch Tower.
3 comments:
History in details!!
So basically Russell thought that Conley's donation showed sincere interest in the message that Russell was trying to get out. So that would have been part of the reason why Conley was made president of the unincorporated Zion's Watch Tower Society in 1881. However, in actuality, the donation led to the beginning of Conley distancing himself from Russell because being a religious gadfly he wasn't that committed to any one viewpoint.
You need to wait for more details. the story isnt what it seems.
Post a Comment