Henry Weber in 1885
Photo is misidentified on web page.
The original shows this to be someone else. Not Weber.
THE STORY IS IN THE DETAILS - Notice: I've withdrawn my books from Amazon. They are now only available at Lulu.com
Please visit our newest posts. We'd love to see your feedback. Copyright Secured. Contact blog owner for permission to use anything you find here.
Search This Blog
Separate Identity Vol. 2
Buy at lulu.com
The video
Buy on lulu.com
Click on the picture
Buy on lulu.com
Click on the picture
Contributors
Blog Archive
-
▼
2020
(163)
-
▼
April
(15)
- Please Understand
- The Photo - UPDATED
- Can we establish this?
- A possible new photograph of Joseph Lytle Russell?
- Useful?
- Hemery Archive
- Photodrama memorabilia
- On Amazon now
- The Cincinnati Daily Star - April 28, 1877
- Catching up ... and
- My Thanks ... and
- C. B. Downing
- Delays
- A. P. Adams
- Latest Review of Separate Identity vol 2
-
▼
April
(15)
Counter
3 comments:
I would agree with Mike also. The photo used in Separate Identity (from a directory of American Florists) was flipped in the earlier post so that it better matched that on the parlor wall for comparison. Those involved with the earlier article have been searching for another photo of Henry Weber with the intention of possibly adding it as confirmation. The Weber archives are at the Smithsonian, and there are Weber descendants out there. But it was an interesting exercise where speculation ultimately took researchers where the evidence led.
Bernard says the second photo is not Weber.
It comes from here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/internetarchivebookimages/17949064110/
The link takes you to a page that includes text about Weber, but the actual photo in the original magazine is captioned "The late Frank Becker" and relates to another item on the same page. There is a very poor image of Weber in a group photo that may get posted at some time, but the key point is that the pic on the parlor wall appears to be him.
Post a Comment