Periodically
we’ve had to restate “the rules,” or state our expectations, or a combination
of both things. It is time for another, similar post.
First
the “usual stuff”: This is a history blog, not a place for theological debate.
It is not a place for wild speculation, obnoxious comments, or any similar
thing. The first rule here is: Respect your fellow posters and respect the blog
editors. If you fail to abide by this first rule, you will disappear from the
blog. Do not criticize another’s religion. This is not the place for it. Do not
presume things about others who comment here. Do not include your presumptions
in blog posts. Some things simply are none of our business, either here or off the blog.
This
blog’s older posts remain as a resource. Many who do not leave comments use it
as such. Be aware that research improves over time, or it should. Before you
use anything from this blog, verify it. Do your due diligence. It pains me to
see your essay, book, or article refer to this blog and see that you relied on
some obscure, probably dated bit that appeared decades ago.
More
seriously, I may have sent you part of our work, pages from volume two, or even
volume three of Separate Identity. An institutional writing committee has seen
in rough draft the majority of volume two. Rough drafts are not reliable, or
may not be. I tell that to a few of those to whom I send work. Some have a long
standing habit of misusing or not using footnotes. Some of those visit this
blog on a regular basis. If you intend to use my work, I expect you to footnote
to it, and I expect you to do it in proper academic format, not in the
haphazard formats you usually use. It is easy to format in one of the accepted
styles. If in doubt, consult the Chicago Manual of Style. [I’m addressing a
specific set of writers who should see themselves in this paragraph.]
If I
tell you that a photo that will appear in volume two is used by permission of
the family that owns it, that means YOU do not have similar permission unless
you contact the family yourself. Photos that appear on this blog are not always
in the public domain. Using one without permission is unethical. And as stated
before, the contents of this blog are copyrighted.
If
you feel free to ask me questions, (I’m assuming you’re one of those with whom
I regularly exchange emails) I expect you to show the same consideration I show
you. If I answer your email promptly, I expect you to answer mine with the same
alacrity.
I
expect that your blog comments will be on topic. An example of a post being off
topic is a fairly recent one where Rachael’s work was rejected because of what
someone else wrote. The comment was personal, and out of order. (This has also happened
to me, though not recently.) Do not blame us for someone else’s opinion. If you
object to a statement, frame your objection in such a way that it addresses the
person who wrote it, not the person who quoted it.
I do
not expect you to agree with everything I write. If you disagree, state your
reason and give me some proof. Without a clear reason backed by proof, all you
have is an opinion. We’re big boys and girls here, or we’re supposed to be. If
you think something here insults your religion, ask yourself if it is factual.
Your opinion based on your limited personal experience is not a persuasive
fact.
Asking
questions in the comment trail is acceptable, though I expect you to do your
own research first. Early in my career I found myself being used as an
encyclopedia. I’m not one. I learned to ask my students: “Where have you
looked? What did you find? Where will you look next?” After we progressed
through these questions, I might suggest a source. Apply this guidance to
yourself before you ask a question here. If you make no progress, then ask your
question.
I
expect you to use direct, simple sentences when commenting. If you pad comments
with the evasive writing style that characterizes some nationalities and many
academics, you will set my teeth on edge. Take responsibility for your opinions
and statements. Failure to do so is exactly the same as blaming your sister for
raiding the cookie jar when you put her up to it.
Do
not email me or call my phone. A limited number of blog visitors have my
permission to email. You’re probably not one of them. [If you’re already
exchanging emails with me, you obviously have my permission to do so.] I’m not
going to share personal information via email. I post some nonsense comments
about family on my twitter account. I mostly follow a few interested in this
blog and some who write on other topics. If you wish, you may follow me, but I
expect you to behave well there too. My ID is @SchulzBw.
3 comments:
Dear Bruce,
reading this blog I´m very frustrated that I did not find it earlier...
I have some early items (e.g. two very nice copies of Zech´s German Tabernacle Shadows with stamps of Weber and Samuel Lauper, German "Song of the Bride" printed by Zech in 1889, first Swedish and Danish tracts and Watch Tower magazines printed in Sweden, some photocopies of letters written by Bro. Weber, etc)that may be interesting for you.
How could I contribute to this blog?!
I have Zech's Tabernacle Shadows, his personal copy donated to us by his great granddaughter. I would like a scan of the German Songs of the Bride and the other things you mention. You may email me at bwschulz2 at yahoo dot com, and we'll work out the details.
Welcome to the blog.
Poor_German_Collector,
I would be interested in scans of the same materials. You can reach me at zionsherald at gmail dot com.
Post a Comment