From the comment trail. I can be flattered ...
I am writing a history of my own Witness congregation, and your example
of clear and accurate research has made my project much better. For
example, you often talk about the importance of using original sources,
and writing history that anyone else can verify. It seems so simple, but
in several cases, I have found that finding the original sources has
led me to modify several key sections of my work, because I was using
secondary sources, which were in many cases only partly truthful, and in
a few cases were clearly incorrect.
Your example has improved my
project immensely. I have had several older members of the congregation
react negatively to parts of the project, because what I wrote did not
coincide with stories they had been passed on for years. The good news
is that in almost every case, when confronted by the undeniable evidence
that what I had written was true, they thanked me for clearing the
matter up. In one case, another older person who did not believe what I
had written is embarking on his own research to try and confirm what he
believes to be true. I surprised him by encouraging him to investigate
the matter fully. (He expected me to try to dissuade him.)
I want
to thank you and your team, not only for your brilliant research, but
also for providing me, and anyone else interested in history, an example
of how to create accurate and verifiable research. You often say, "Go
where the facts lead you," which sounds simple enough. But you practice
what you preach, and I am grateful for your good example. And I know of
many others who read the blog, but never comment, who would say the same
thing.
Andrew Grzadzielewski
No comments:
Post a Comment