4. To Terry Island
A steady stream of articles by
Barbour appeared in The Crisis throughout 1872 and 1873, but they only
obliquely indicate the strength of his following. In the April 2, 1872, issue
of The Crisis, Barbour wrote: “The
virgins are waking up, and trimming their lamps by hundreds and by thousands,
and still the cry goes on.[1]
Some only accepted part of the message, but still pointed to 1873 as the Day of
Judgment. He wrote: “There are many overwhelming evidences for 1873. Some of
our brethren see one of these, the 1335 days, and are preaching it; others see
more.”[2]
Barbour moved to Boston, very much the center of non-Sabatarian Adventism. A
contemporary publication, Bacon's Dictionary of Boston, demonstrates
this. From it we discover why Boston appealed to Barbour:
The
existence of the Boston “Church of the Adventists” dates back to
1843, when, in May of that year, Millerites built the “Tabernacle,” a large
temporary building on Howard Street. In the 1870s there were two Advent
Churches in Boston. The Advent Christian congregation was “the most noteworthy
of these.” It was located 09 West Concord Street. Organized in the 1840s, it
was the descendent congregation of the Lowell Street Advent Church which had
replaced the temporary tabernacle. The Advent Christian Publication Society was
incorporated in 1854. Its primary publication was The World's Crisis, a
weekly. They also published The Young Pilgrim, a semi-monthly
Sunday-school paper, The American Quarterly Journal of Prophecy, and the
Blessed Hope Quarterly.
Adventists
a split over the question of Inherent Immortality in 1854. The “old Adventists”
took the name “Evangelical Adventists.” Their congregation met on Shawmut
Avenue near Williams Street. They published the Messiah’s Herald.”
Though the Adventist “thriving period” was in the 1840s when Joshua V. Hines
was pastor, Boston was in the 1870s still a center of Adventism. The World’s
Crisis published Barbour’s articles and a significant number of Evangelical
Adventists were swayed by his arguments. Boston was a logical choice from which
to publish his new magazine, The Midnight Cry and Herald of the Morning.[3]
There is one estimate of the
movement’s strength, but its worth is questionable. An article entitled “End of
the World” appearing in the November 4, 1873, issue of The Boston Globe quoted
S. W. Bishop as saying: “We are satisfied that we are children of the Most High
God ... . We have portions of our company in every State and section of the
Union, and in the British provinces, in England, Ireland, Scotland and Norway.
We think it providential that we are so scattered. We number 34,000 in all.” We
think he meant not just those who believed Christ would return that year, but
all Adventists. Even then, this is a wildly inflated number. It cannot be taken
as a well-founded count of those looking forward to 1873. Still, Bishop’s words
suggest a sizable portion of Second Adventists took the prediction seriously.
Even
among those not disposed to set dates there was cautious interest. E. E.
Reinke, one of the editors of Prophetic Times, wrote:
We are not wanting in a lively consciousness of
the repeated chronological failures on the part of some students who have
preceded us. ... Yet with all this full in view, we not only retain the
conviction ... that we are living in a time pregnant with the most important
issues, but also that the parousia of the Lord is not only near, but
imminent; so imminent, that it not only might, but probably will, transpire
shortly. ...
In the belief that the parousia ... will
transpire shortly, we may be mistaken. We have no authority, nor any
inclination to fix a definite time for the beginning of the day of the Lord. It
may not begin in our lifetime, but our positive duty, and our privilege, to
wait for it every day, will not be in the least thereby affected.[4]
[1] N. H. Barbour: The
Seventy Weeks, The World’s Crisis and Second Advent Messenger, April 3,
1872.
1 comment:
This adds nothing to your specific research, but is just a general comment. The records available to researchers are continuing to grow and improve, so it is always worth revisiting what we have done in the past. I am currently revising one of my own major projects from 7-8 years ago, and a lot of new information has come to light. Originally I was helped by the late Ton de Geus who was an excellent researcher and would have found all there was to be found. But there is more today than there was then. Another project from 8-9 years ago required corresponding with a library which obligingly scanned numerous cuttings for me over several months because they were not online. But now, in the past two years, they are. However did we manage before the internet?
Post a Comment