Russell again invested in a large printing, announcing
in the September 1882 issue: “The October number of zion's watch tower will partake of a missionary character.
We will be sending out a very large issue to new readers – about two hundred
thousand in all. If you desire you may share in the work of scattering the ‘good
tidings of great joy,’ by sending copies of this missionary number to your
Christian friends. Order as many as you can use judiciously, or send us their
addresses and we will supply them.”[1]
The
issue was a combined issue, dated October-November 1882. Russell ‘introduced’
the paper to the Sunday-School Superintendents for whom it was intended:
Inasmuch as this number of ZION'S WATCH TOWER will go to
each of the ninety thousand Sunday School Superintendents of all denominations
in the United States, it is proper for us to introduce our paper to them
specially.
The special mission of ZION'S WATCH TOWER is to
clearly and forcibly elucidate and present truth on all religious topics, without
fear or favor of any except our heavenly Master. It is strictly unsectarian and
follows no formulated creed. Its method – comparing Scripture with Scripture,
we believe to be the correct one for the elucidation of truth. Thus getting
God's own explanation of His will and plan, we realize that God is his own
interpreter, And He will make it plain.
While desirous of the esteem and fellowship of every
child of God and loath to offend any, we yet stand ready to offend all, if a
clear and forcible presentation of any Scriptural teaching shall have that
effect. We discuss all Bible doctrines, not shunning the most abstruse – an
uncommon thing among Christian journals.
This feature makes our paper valuable to Sunday School
Superintendents and Bible teachers, and advanced Bible scholars, in this day
when infidelity is challenging nearly every doctrine held by the churches.
Surely there never was a time when an open and fearless examination of every
point of doctrine was so much more needed than practiced. An intelligent
understanding of Scripture was never more necessary than now.
We desire to assist in this great work, and with
others to raise up the standard of truth against error in every form. We make
no claim to defend every theory and creed of Christendom – this would be
impossible, since many of them contradict each other – but we endeavor to draw
direct from Scripture its uncolored and unbiased teaching on all questions.
Believing that the true basis of Christian Union is a correct understanding of
God's Word, rather than an ignoring of differences, we seek for this.
This sample copy is sent you in order that if desired,
it may be one of your assistants in seeking for Scriptural truths. We will send
it on trial.
THREE MONTHS FREE.
to all Sunday School Superintendents, teachers and
Bible scholars. We therefore invite you to send in your names at once.[2]
Russell
included an explanation of his motive in sending out this missionary issue:
A very large edition of this issue has been sent out
in hope of awakening thinking Christians from the lethargy and worldliness which
has so largely overspread Christendom. The topics presented will be new to many
of them, and we trust that all thoroughly consecrated readers will test it, and
decide on its truthfulness, not by their prejudices, not by any sectarian
creed, but by the Word of God, the only proper and infallible test; remembering,
that the cause of divisions or sects is, that each party defends its creed,
instead of laying aside tradition or accepting the harmonious testimony of
Scripture.[3]
Russell
and Watch Tower adherents continued to send out literature to clergy and
evangelists until near Russell’s death in 1916, perhaps afterward as well. The
Word and Witness, a Pentecostal paper published in Malvern, Arkansas,
opposed publishing the names and mailing addresses of their preachers. Some
were young and not stable and others who were “supposed to be stable, even old
men, have been led astray with Russellite and Millennial Dawn teaching.” The
paper’s editor said it was “astonishing what inroads the devil is making by
watching for such addresses, and sending these hungry but untaught hearts such destructive
tracts.”[4]
Russell inserted a notice in the January 1883 Watch Tower inviting those
who received the sample copies to subscribe:
We offered the Tower
three months on trial, free. Many availed themselves of the offer and others
sent us lists of names of friends they thought would be interested by the
papers. With this number we complete the three numbers to about ten thousand
such trial readers. [Oct., Dec. and January.] All of these who are interested,
we hope to hear from at once. The Lord’s poor who are interested, but
unable to pay, should remember that they are welcome to the Tower free, but must ask for it.
We have extra copies of these three issues.[5]
We do
not know how many of the “about ten thousand” trial readers subscribed.
Offering the paper free to the Lord’s poor is unique to the Watch Tower
as far as we can uncover. Later, in 1912, William T. Ellis, a Presbyterian
Clergyman, would dismiss this, writing: “Russell's people do not go out into
the field of evangelism, reclaiming the unchurched. One searches his record in
vain for anything about the rescue of the outcast and the sinning. Neither
is there any trace of interest in the thronging social problems of our time. Ministry to the poor, visitation of the sick, care for the orphaned – these are outside of the pale of Russellite activities.
The limit of his benevolences is to send his literature free to ‘the Lord's poor.’”[6]
is there any trace of interest in the thronging social problems of our time. Ministry to the poor, visitation of the sick, care for the orphaned – these are outside of the pale of Russellite activities.
The limit of his benevolences is to send his literature free to ‘the Lord's poor.’”[6]
Ellis’
comments are a series of lies that would not be worth addressing except that he
is quoted by modern opponents of Jehovah’s Witnesses. We are not writing a
polemic; this is not written to support or condemn the descendant religions of
the Russell era Watch Tower. But if you oppose them, you should do so honestly.
You should fact check. Those who quote Ellis do neither. In other chapters [among
them “Out of Babylon” and “In the World but Not of It.”] we touch on these
issues and present evidence that Russell era congregation structure was such
that support for the poor, evangelism of the ‘unchurched sinners’ and concern
for social issues were part of Russellite belief and practice. We give examples
of the conversion of that class to Watch Tower belief. What Ellis objected to
was Russellite belief that the full rule of Christ was at hand. Ellis was a post-millennialist.
He believed that human efforts would bring any Kingdom of God. This was a view
that was dieing among Protestants, but which persists among some until today. Despite
this viewpoint conflict, Ellis simply got it wrong, and appealing to Watch
Tower literature without reference points was fakery of the worst sort. As we
said, he lied.
[1] Untitled Announcement, Zion’s Watch Tower,
September 1882, page 1.
[2] C. T. Russell: Sunday School Superintendents, Zion’s
Watch Tower, October-November 1882, page 1.
[3] C. T. Russell: View from the Tower, Zion’s Watch
Tower, October-November 1882, page 1.
[4] A Warning, The Word and Witness, December 20,
1913.
[5] Untitled announcement, Zion’s Watch Tower,
January 1883, page 1.
[6] W. T. Ellis: Investigating and Instigator, The
Continent, September 26, 1912, page 1342.
3 comments:
Thank you for posting this, and for inviting our comments.
I have a comment, and a few questions, for the sake of clarification.
In the September 1882 of ZWT, Russell spoke of sending out "about two hundred thousand in all." of the missionary issue. In January 1883 he mentioned 10,000 trial readers, each receiving several issues. Are there any figures available as to how many issues were eventually sent?
I find it of interest that he stated that "ZION'S WATCH TOWER . . . is strictly unsectarian and follows no formulated creed." Doesn't that statement reflect the overall state of his belief system at that time - that it was still in process of formulation, and that as it became more systemized, various adherents dropped away?
Russell referred to "the true basis of Christian Union". I Noticed that both "Christian" and "Union" were capitalized. Was that a current topic, specifically under that name? I ask because of the Restorationist denomination Christian Union, founded in Ohio in 1864, partly in an effort to allow laymen to freely interpret the Bible. Is there any record of kinship or sympathy between Russell and the Christian Union denomination.
I have always been in agreement with your advice: "if you oppose them, you should do so honestly." I have even told that to religious detractors - if you have an objection, present it, but don't resort to lies. Too much of that still going on.
I don't know the answer to Andrew's interesting questions but can add that the much later Photodrama of Creation was advertised as ''unsectarian" and a few IBSA COs in Britain referred to themselves as such in their Military Service Tribunals from 1916 onwards when asked which denomination they belonged to. This made them difficult to identify and sometimes required verification from other Bible Student sources, notably Daily Manna records.
I therefore take the IBSA use of the term unsectarian to mean that they did not belong to any of the traditional churches or belief systems. Of course, from the standpoint of the traditional churches this would be their very definition of sectarian!
Nice to be visiting your blog once more, it has been months for me. Well this article that ive been waited for therefore long. i want this article to finish my assignment within the faculty, and it has same topic together with your article. Thanks, nice share.
Custom labels
Post a Comment