Usual rules. You may take a copy for your own use. Do not share it off the blog without permission. This is rough draft and may change. Never rely on a temporary post. This is a rough draft chapter from Separate Identity 2.
In All the Earth: The United
Kingdom
The first concentrated
international missionary activity was in the United Kingdom. It is impossible
to gage interest in Britain before the publication of Food for Thinking
Christians. Previous to its publication the only letters appearing in Zion’s
Watch Tower were doctrinal, and few names and few or no locations were
noted. There were Bible Examiner readers in Scotland at least by 1850; a
letter from William Glen Montcrieff, a noted Scot Conditionalist, appeared in
the May 1850 issue. Letters from other British Conditionalists appeared too.
There had been some notice of the work in The Rainbow. A British
clergyman and Barbourite, Elias H. Tuckett, wrote three articles for Rainbow.
There may have been some small residual interest from that.[1] Barbour
mailed his Coming of the Lord tract to the British journal The
Christadelphian, which reviewed it negatively.[2]
Later The Rainbow reviewed The Three Words, though somewhat
negatively. The book saw a very limited circulation in England.[3]
There is also some indication that Paton mailed material to his relatives in
Scotland, but this seems to have born little to no fruitage. Yet, a prominent
adherent in Newark, New Jersey, claimed adherents in England and elsewhere. “We
have,” he said, “members all over America, England, Australia, I think, and
probably in Germany.”[4]
Russell asked John Corbin
Sunderlin and later Joseph Jacob Bender (June 21, 1838 - February 10, 1905) to
travel to the United Kingdom to publish Food for Thinking Christians and
to direct a massive circulation campaign. Sunderlin had prior experience as an
itinerate photographer and may have been chosen on that basis. Less is known of
J. J. Bender. Historians including Watch Tower writers have never profiled him.
Bender was a traveling sales agent for and later owner of a chemical company.[5] In
most city directory listings he is noted by the initials “J. J.” but his first
name is given in J. F. Diffenbacher’s Directory of Pittsburgh and Allegheny
Cities for 1881-1882 and his middle name is found in family papers. Bender
published The Standard Class-Book for Sunday-School Teacher’s Minutes in
1871, which was favorably reviewed by The Sunday School Journal that
year.[6] In
May 1886 he and a partner purchased The Bookmart, a magazine published
in Pittsburgh devoted to book and autography collecting.[7]
Sunderlin was in Britain by
July 11, 1881, when he registered with Gillig’s American Exchange in London, “a
familiar and popular resort with Americans in the English metropolis.”[8] He
received his mail and made currency exchanges at Gillig’s. It appears that the
British edition of Food for Thinking Christians saw publication before
the American edition but this is uncertain. Sunderlin arranged with William
Cate, a London printer, to publish the booklet.[9]
The remainder of this post has been deleted.
9 comments:
Always a pleasure to read your work Rachael and Bruce. I am sure you are right in concluding that the Bible Student message did not initially reach the poverty stricken working classes of the major cities. It seems to have originally attracted the lower middle classes and later the working classes, more in the 1920s and 1930s.
One thing worth mentioning is the duplication of the paragraph regarding reference 47 and 51, I think it was.
With much appreciation,
Gary
All good stuff and nice to read the latest version of this. Just one question on very quick reading. Your chapter ends by stating that in 1881 most adults in the United Kingdom were illiterate and signed their name with their mark. Where did you get this data from? The website ourworldindata.org has a chart on literacy in England and the general UK since 1580. In 1880 it gives male literacy in Britain at just over 70% and female literacy at just over 50%. That tallies with my own use of historical documents going back through the 19th century. Illiteracy was certainly high until the general education acts, and doesn't detract from your point that a large number would find Food for Thinking inaccessible even if they saw it. But I just query "most" adults.
Jerome,
B says that comes from an analysis of church registers showing that most signed with a 'mark.' I don't have the exact title yet. We'll do additional research, but we are not inclined to revise based on a website claim.
B also says that our comment is relative to the adult population Literacy rates among children were much higher due to education reform.
Thanks for the article. I am copying it for my personal use.
It is really not a big issue - but the statistics I quoted were based on adults and the surviving samples of church documents that were still used in c.1880, over 40 years after civil registration became law. It was also based on my own 40 years experience as a family historian. Making a mark still happened on occasion in 1881, but was not the majority. However, the point made, that many could not benefit from CTR's work even if they wanted to, is not disputed at all. It is a very valid point and is made well. But since you made such a precise statement about UK literacy statistics I just wondered where you had got the information from?
Albert Hudson's book Bible Students in Britain (1989) gives June 1882 as the date for the start of the Glasgow group "little more than six months after the distribution of (Food)"..."as far as records and recollection can tell." There is a handwritten document compiled by Hudson (which has now been sent to you) that has by Glasgow the note June 1882, 7 brothers, 5 sisters. Of course, this is all unverified. I can only say that another disputed date in the same document that I WAS able to check turned out to be correct. Maybe records survived into the era when Hudson lived and was a Bible Student, maybe he had information passed on verbally by William Crawford, whom he knew.
Hudson's last given date was 1883. This represents his final conclusion. We'll stick with that. Both dates are unproven.
Oh, I got too late. In a quick peek yesterday I read the subheadings and love the systematic way the information is presented. I am looking forward to reading the book.
Post a Comment